Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm

Abstract Background The relationship between aging and epigenetic profiles has been highlighted in many recent studies. Models using somatic cell methylomes to predict age have been successfully constructed. However, gamete aging is quite distinct and as such age prediction using sperm methylomes is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy G. Jenkins, Kenneth I. Aston, Bradley Cairns, Andrew Smith, Douglas T. Carrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-018-5153-4
id doaj-c58070fa31ea4fc9ab1487f52d896a4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c58070fa31ea4fc9ab1487f52d896a4e2020-11-25T01:42:21ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642018-10-0119111010.1186/s12864-018-5153-4Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human spermTimothy G. Jenkins0Kenneth I. Aston1Bradley Cairns2Andrew Smith3Douglas T. Carrell4Andrology and IVF Laboratories, University of UtahAndrology and IVF Laboratories, University of UtahHuntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of Southern CaliforniaAndrology and IVF Laboratories, University of UtahAbstract Background The relationship between aging and epigenetic profiles has been highlighted in many recent studies. Models using somatic cell methylomes to predict age have been successfully constructed. However, gamete aging is quite distinct and as such age prediction using sperm methylomes is ineffective with current techniques. Results We have produced a model that utilizes human sperm DNA methylation signatures to predict chronological age by utilizing methylation array data from a total of 329 samples. The dataset used for model construction includes infertile patients, sperm donors, and individuals from the general population. Our model is capable predicting age with an R2 of 0.89, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.04 years, and a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 6.28% in our data set. We additionally investigated the reproducibility of prediction with our model in an independent cohort where 6 technical replicates of 10 individual samples were tested on different arrays. We found very similar age prediction accuracy (MAE = 2.37 years; MAPE = 7.05%) with a high degree of precision between replicates (standard deviation of only 0.877 years). Additionally, we found that smokers trended toward increased age profiles when compared to ‘never smokers’ though this pattern was only striking in a portion of the samples screened. Conclusions The predictive model described herein was built to offer researchers the ability to assess “germ line age” by accessing sperm DNA methylation signatures at genomic regions affected by age. Our data suggest that this model can predict an individual’s chronological age with a high degree of accuracy regardless of fertility status and with a high degree of repeatability. Additionally, our data suggest that the aging process in sperm may be impacted by environmental factors, though this effect appears to be quite subtle and future work is needed to establish this relationship.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-018-5153-4Sperm epigeneticsAgingDNA methylationAging calculator
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy G. Jenkins
Kenneth I. Aston
Bradley Cairns
Andrew Smith
Douglas T. Carrell
spellingShingle Timothy G. Jenkins
Kenneth I. Aston
Bradley Cairns
Andrew Smith
Douglas T. Carrell
Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
BMC Genomics
Sperm epigenetics
Aging
DNA methylation
Aging calculator
author_facet Timothy G. Jenkins
Kenneth I. Aston
Bradley Cairns
Andrew Smith
Douglas T. Carrell
author_sort Timothy G. Jenkins
title Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
title_short Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
title_full Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
title_fullStr Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
title_full_unstemmed Paternal germ line aging: DNA methylation age prediction from human sperm
title_sort paternal germ line aging: dna methylation age prediction from human sperm
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract Background The relationship between aging and epigenetic profiles has been highlighted in many recent studies. Models using somatic cell methylomes to predict age have been successfully constructed. However, gamete aging is quite distinct and as such age prediction using sperm methylomes is ineffective with current techniques. Results We have produced a model that utilizes human sperm DNA methylation signatures to predict chronological age by utilizing methylation array data from a total of 329 samples. The dataset used for model construction includes infertile patients, sperm donors, and individuals from the general population. Our model is capable predicting age with an R2 of 0.89, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.04 years, and a mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 6.28% in our data set. We additionally investigated the reproducibility of prediction with our model in an independent cohort where 6 technical replicates of 10 individual samples were tested on different arrays. We found very similar age prediction accuracy (MAE = 2.37 years; MAPE = 7.05%) with a high degree of precision between replicates (standard deviation of only 0.877 years). Additionally, we found that smokers trended toward increased age profiles when compared to ‘never smokers’ though this pattern was only striking in a portion of the samples screened. Conclusions The predictive model described herein was built to offer researchers the ability to assess “germ line age” by accessing sperm DNA methylation signatures at genomic regions affected by age. Our data suggest that this model can predict an individual’s chronological age with a high degree of accuracy regardless of fertility status and with a high degree of repeatability. Additionally, our data suggest that the aging process in sperm may be impacted by environmental factors, though this effect appears to be quite subtle and future work is needed to establish this relationship.
topic Sperm epigenetics
Aging
DNA methylation
Aging calculator
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-018-5153-4
work_keys_str_mv AT timothygjenkins paternalgermlineagingdnamethylationagepredictionfromhumansperm
AT kennethiaston paternalgermlineagingdnamethylationagepredictionfromhumansperm
AT bradleycairns paternalgermlineagingdnamethylationagepredictionfromhumansperm
AT andrewsmith paternalgermlineagingdnamethylationagepredictionfromhumansperm
AT douglastcarrell paternalgermlineagingdnamethylationagepredictionfromhumansperm
_version_ 1725037110717579264