The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe

<span class="abs_content">This article proposes an alternative categorization of the populist phenomena, by elaborating the distinction between electoral-delegative and participative-mobilising populisms. All the populist phe-nomena share some common traits, such as a polarising and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Enrico Padoan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coordinamento SIBA 2017-10-01
Series:Partecipazione e Conflitto
Subjects:
Online Access:http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/17735
id doaj-c5578c1148cd4343864a359aa20d30c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5578c1148cd4343864a359aa20d30c02021-06-28T08:02:39ZengCoordinamento SIBAPartecipazione e Conflitto1972-76232035-66092017-10-0110251754310.1285/i20356609v10i2p51716314The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern EuropeEnrico Padoan0Pontificial Catholic University of Chile<span class="abs_content">This article proposes an alternative categorization of the populist phenomena, by elaborating the distinction between electoral-delegative and participative-mobilising populisms. All the populist phe-nomena share some common traits, such as a polarising and antagonist discourse dividing the society into a "People" and some "elites" or privileged sectors, their reliance on a strong leadership, a pretension to be majoritarian and to achieve the power at the national level in order to restore the sovereignty of the People. Nonetheless, the strategies for achieving these goals vary according to the specific diagnoses that would correct the perceived deficiencies of the representative democracies in terms of accountabil-ity of the representatives. The populisms closer to the electoral-delegative pole stress the symbolic di-mension of the concept of representation, thus relying on a strong leader able to "truly interpret" the general will of the People. Those closer to the participative-mobilising pole call for an active involvement of the People in the decision-making process in order to effectively control the public institutions, stress-ing the descriptive dimension of the concept of representation and sometimes questioning the theoreti-cal bases sustaining the representative democracy. I provide a brief discussion on four participative-mo-bilising populist experiences, i.e. the MAS-IPSP, the Kirchnerism, the M5S and Podemos, focusing on their internal organizations and relying on an extensive fieldwork (consisting in one hundred in-depth inter-views with country experts and party's representatives at regional and national levels) that I conducted for a broader research project.</span><br />http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/17735populismpolitical representationparty organizationsouthern europelatin america
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Enrico Padoan
spellingShingle Enrico Padoan
The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
Partecipazione e Conflitto
populism
political representation
party organization
southern europe
latin america
author_facet Enrico Padoan
author_sort Enrico Padoan
title The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
title_short The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
title_full The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
title_fullStr The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
title_full_unstemmed The Populist Re-Politicization. Some Lessons from South America and Southern Europe
title_sort populist re-politicization. some lessons from south america and southern europe
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
series Partecipazione e Conflitto
issn 1972-7623
2035-6609
publishDate 2017-10-01
description <span class="abs_content">This article proposes an alternative categorization of the populist phenomena, by elaborating the distinction between electoral-delegative and participative-mobilising populisms. All the populist phe-nomena share some common traits, such as a polarising and antagonist discourse dividing the society into a "People" and some "elites" or privileged sectors, their reliance on a strong leadership, a pretension to be majoritarian and to achieve the power at the national level in order to restore the sovereignty of the People. Nonetheless, the strategies for achieving these goals vary according to the specific diagnoses that would correct the perceived deficiencies of the representative democracies in terms of accountabil-ity of the representatives. The populisms closer to the electoral-delegative pole stress the symbolic di-mension of the concept of representation, thus relying on a strong leader able to "truly interpret" the general will of the People. Those closer to the participative-mobilising pole call for an active involvement of the People in the decision-making process in order to effectively control the public institutions, stress-ing the descriptive dimension of the concept of representation and sometimes questioning the theoreti-cal bases sustaining the representative democracy. I provide a brief discussion on four participative-mo-bilising populist experiences, i.e. the MAS-IPSP, the Kirchnerism, the M5S and Podemos, focusing on their internal organizations and relying on an extensive fieldwork (consisting in one hundred in-depth inter-views with country experts and party's representatives at regional and national levels) that I conducted for a broader research project.</span><br />
topic populism
political representation
party organization
southern europe
latin america
url http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/17735
work_keys_str_mv AT enricopadoan thepopulistrepoliticizationsomelessonsfromsouthamericaandsoutherneurope
AT enricopadoan populistrepoliticizationsomelessonsfromsouthamericaandsoutherneurope
_version_ 1721356668528230400