Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction. Crohn’s disease is most commonly found in the terminal ileum and colonic region. Magnetic resonance has become a useful modality for assessing small bowel activity. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of MR in detecting small bowel activity as w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osman Ahmed, David Mario Rodrigues, Geoffrey C. Nguyen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7857352
id doaj-c52f93d2a12446fca15bbf3e431c29b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c52f93d2a12446fca15bbf3e431c29b22020-11-24T22:38:48ZengHindawi LimitedCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27892291-27972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/78573527857352Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisOsman Ahmed0David Mario Rodrigues1Geoffrey C. Nguyen2Mount Sinai Hospital Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, CanadaMount Sinai Hospital Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, CanadaMount Sinai Hospital Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, CanadaIntroduction. Crohn’s disease is most commonly found in the terminal ileum and colonic region. Magnetic resonance has become a useful modality for assessing small bowel activity. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of MR in detecting small bowel activity as well as extramural complications in Crohn’s patients. Methods. Two independent reviewers sorted through articles until October 2, 2014. We included both studies providing raw data for pooling and studies without raw data. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each study. Results. There were 27 included studies, of which 19 were included in the pooled analysis. Pooled analysis of the 19 studies (1020 patients) with raw data revealed a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.91) and specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.91). In regard to detecting stenosis, pooled sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.76) and specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96). Conclusion. MR imaging provides a reliable alternative in detecting small bowel activity in patients with Crohn’s disease. Its advantages include high diagnostic accuracy and no radiation exposure while its disadvantages include high cost and limited availability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7857352
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Osman Ahmed
David Mario Rodrigues
Geoffrey C. Nguyen
spellingShingle Osman Ahmed
David Mario Rodrigues
Geoffrey C. Nguyen
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
author_facet Osman Ahmed
David Mario Rodrigues
Geoffrey C. Nguyen
author_sort Osman Ahmed
title Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel in crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
issn 2291-2789
2291-2797
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Introduction. Crohn’s disease is most commonly found in the terminal ileum and colonic region. Magnetic resonance has become a useful modality for assessing small bowel activity. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of MR in detecting small bowel activity as well as extramural complications in Crohn’s patients. Methods. Two independent reviewers sorted through articles until October 2, 2014. We included both studies providing raw data for pooling and studies without raw data. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each study. Results. There were 27 included studies, of which 19 were included in the pooled analysis. Pooled analysis of the 19 studies (1020 patients) with raw data revealed a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.91) and specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.91). In regard to detecting stenosis, pooled sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.76) and specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96). Conclusion. MR imaging provides a reliable alternative in detecting small bowel activity in patients with Crohn’s disease. Its advantages include high diagnostic accuracy and no radiation exposure while its disadvantages include high cost and limited availability.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7857352
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanahmed magneticresonanceimagingofthesmallbowelincrohnsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidmariorodrigues magneticresonanceimagingofthesmallbowelincrohnsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT geoffreycnguyen magneticresonanceimagingofthesmallbowelincrohnsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725711857615896576