Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System
Implementation and operation of municipal wastewater collection systems is an essential part of qualitative water resource management. In this paper, the most appropriate alternative among a set of limited of wastewater collection systems was selected using different quantitative and qualitative att...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water and Wastewater Consulting Engineers Research Development
2014-10-01
|
Series: | آب و فاضلاب |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.wwjournal.ir/article_5096_afd18933ad159134d166a8939dd3b5df.pdf |
id |
doaj-c51ff5f75f784d79bc002195d243d1c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c51ff5f75f784d79bc002195d243d1c12021-03-02T01:51:07ZengWater and Wastewater Consulting Engineers Research Developmentآب و فاضلاب1024-59362383-09052014-10-012541121175096Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater SystemMehrdad Mirabi0Hojjat Mianabadi1Mohammadbagher Sharifi2کارشناس ارشد عمران آب، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهددانشجوی دکترای منابع آب، دانشگاه دلفت هلنددانشیار، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهدImplementation and operation of municipal wastewater collection systems is an essential part of qualitative water resource management. In this paper, the most appropriate alternative among a set of limited of wastewater collection systems was selected using different quantitative and qualitative attributes. Moreover, the impact of risk attitudes of decision makers (DMs) on selection of the most preferred alternative was evaluated. As a case study the best alternative was examined using four MADM methods including Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Compromise Programming (CP), TOPSIS, and Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) to validate the application of RB-MADM methods in wastewater collection systems. Then, the impact of selection of MADM method on the final outcome was studied and the results were compared.http://www.wwjournal.ir/article_5096_afd18933ad159134d166a8939dd3b5df.pdfSewage Collection SystemsMulti Criteria Decision MakingRisk ProneRisk AversionNiasar City |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mehrdad Mirabi Hojjat Mianabadi Mohammadbagher Sharifi |
spellingShingle |
Mehrdad Mirabi Hojjat Mianabadi Mohammadbagher Sharifi Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System آب و فاضلاب Sewage Collection Systems Multi Criteria Decision Making Risk Prone Risk Aversion Niasar City |
author_facet |
Mehrdad Mirabi Hojjat Mianabadi Mohammadbagher Sharifi |
author_sort |
Mehrdad Mirabi |
title |
Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System |
title_short |
Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System |
title_full |
Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System |
title_fullStr |
Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Urban Wastewater System |
title_sort |
multi attribute decision making approach for the selection of urban wastewater system |
publisher |
Water and Wastewater Consulting Engineers Research Development |
series |
آب و فاضلاب |
issn |
1024-5936 2383-0905 |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
Implementation and operation of municipal wastewater collection systems is an essential part of qualitative water resource management. In this paper, the most appropriate alternative among a set of limited of wastewater collection systems was selected using different quantitative and qualitative attributes. Moreover, the impact of risk attitudes of decision makers (DMs) on selection of the most preferred alternative was evaluated. As a case study the best alternative was examined using four MADM methods including Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Compromise Programming (CP), TOPSIS, and Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) to validate the application of RB-MADM methods in wastewater collection systems. Then, the impact of selection of MADM method on the final outcome was studied and the results were compared. |
topic |
Sewage Collection Systems Multi Criteria Decision Making Risk Prone Risk Aversion Niasar City |
url |
http://www.wwjournal.ir/article_5096_afd18933ad159134d166a8939dd3b5df.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mehrdadmirabi multiattributedecisionmakingapproachfortheselectionofurbanwastewatersystem AT hojjatmianabadi multiattributedecisionmakingapproachfortheselectionofurbanwastewatersystem AT mohammadbaghersharifi multiattributedecisionmakingapproachfortheselectionofurbanwastewatersystem |
_version_ |
1724244578630893568 |