ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »

As part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2016-11-01
Series:KAS African Law Study Library
Online Access:https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142
id doaj-c51feb7ba59847e9aa779edd225cdcb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c51feb7ba59847e9aa779edd225cdcb92020-11-25T03:52:11ZengNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KGKAS African Law Study Library2363-62622016-11-013114216510.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-1421057712363626220161142ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCEAs part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolability of this provision is relative, because she first mission is to make intan- gibles other provisions. Far from our intention to say that this provision be revised to re- move it all its legal force. Only a single revision-addition is possible to make Article 220 expressly intangible.https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE
spellingShingle Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
KAS African Law Study Library
author_facet Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE
author_sort Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE
title ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
title_short ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
title_full ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
title_fullStr ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
title_full_unstemmed ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
title_sort article 220 de la constitution du 18 fevrier 2006. contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
series KAS African Law Study Library
issn 2363-6262
publishDate 2016-11-01
description As part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolability of this provision is relative, because she first mission is to make intan- gibles other provisions. Far from our intention to say that this provision be revised to re- move it all its legal force. Only a single revision-addition is possible to make Article 220 expressly intangible.
url https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142
work_keys_str_mv AT milambongalamulumegalance article220delaconstitutiondu18fevrier2006contributionaudebatautourdesonintangibiliteetdesarevisabilite
_version_ 1724483893371863040