ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »
As part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolabili...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2016-11-01
|
Series: | KAS African Law Study Library |
Online Access: | https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142 |
id |
doaj-c51feb7ba59847e9aa779edd225cdcb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c51feb7ba59847e9aa779edd225cdcb92020-11-25T03:52:11ZengNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KGKAS African Law Study Library2363-62622016-11-013114216510.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-1421057712363626220161142ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité »Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCEAs part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolability of this provision is relative, because she first mission is to make intan- gibles other provisions. Far from our intention to say that this provision be revised to re- move it all its legal force. Only a single revision-addition is possible to make Article 220 expressly intangible.https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE |
spellingShingle |
Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » KAS African Law Study Library |
author_facet |
Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE |
author_sort |
Milambo NGALAMULUME GALANCE |
title |
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
title_short |
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
title_full |
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
title_fullStr |
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
title_full_unstemmed |
ARTICLE 220 DE LA CONSTITUTION DU 18 FEVRIER 2006. Contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
title_sort |
article 220 de la constitution du 18 fevrier 2006. contribution au débat autour de son intangibilité et de sa « révisabilité » |
publisher |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
series |
KAS African Law Study Library |
issn |
2363-6262 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
As part of this dissertation, it was a question of analyzing to what extent Article 220 of the Constitution of 18 February 2006 may be revised without this revision is bend the constitu- tional foundations of the Third Republic established by the original constituent. It is true that the inviolability of this provision is relative, because she first mission is to make intan- gibles other provisions. Far from our intention to say that this provision be revised to re- move it all its legal force. Only a single revision-addition is possible to make Article 220 expressly intangible. |
url |
https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6262-2016-1-142 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT milambongalamulumegalance article220delaconstitutiondu18fevrier2006contributionaudebatautourdesonintangibiliteetdesarevisabilite |
_version_ |
1724483893371863040 |