Ultrasound as an Alternative to Conventional Marination: Acceptability and Mass Transfer

• Main Authors: Leopolda González-González, Lorena Luna-Rodríguez, Luis M. Carrillo-López, Alma D. Alarcón-Rojo, Iván García-Galicia, Raúl Reyes-Villagrana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2017-01-01
• Series: Journal of Food Quality
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8675720

In this study, the effects of ultrasound- (US-) assisted beef marination on consumer perception and the homogeneity of the solute and mass transfer were evaluated. Marinated and US-treated meat samples (40 kHz, 11 W/cm2 for 20, 40, and 60 min, and storing at 4°C for 7 d) were evaluated by a group of consumers using a structured 9-point hedonic scale of satisfaction. The preferences were analyzed with XLSTAT-Sensory® software. The analysis was performed in conjunction with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic study to evaluate the sodium transference. The perception analysis indicated that the use of US-assisted marination did not increase the beef acceptability. The sonicated samples showed a more homogeneous distribution of sodium. However, traditional marination (TM) stored for 7 d resulted in greater mass transfer than the US-assisted marination without storage.