Assessing change in patient-reported quality of life after elective surgery: protocol for an observational comparison study [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
Despite their widespread use, the two main methods of assessing quality of life after surgery have never been directly compared. To support patient decision-making and study design, we aim to compare these two methods. The first of these methods is to assess quality of life before surgery and again...
Main Authors: | Vanessa L. Kronzer, Michelle R. Jerry, Michael S. Avidan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-05-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/5-976/v1 |
Similar Items
-
Whose sample is it anyway? Widespread misannotation of samples in transcriptomics studies [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Lilah Toker, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Whose sample is it anyway? Widespread misannotation of samples in transcriptomics studies [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Lilah Toker, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
The challenges with the validation of research antibodies [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Jan L.A. Voskuil
Published: (2017-02-01) -
Characterization and stability evaluation of nanoencapsulated epoxylignans [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Yusnita Rifai, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
MicroRNA levels quantified in whole blood varies from PBMCs [version 3; referees: 2 approved, 1 not approved]
by: Sadaf Atarod, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)