The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor

Background: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexandria University 2011-09-01
Series:Journal of High Institute of Public Health
Subjects:
id doaj-c4f1de21ee1146b0bcd2eb6ebf07f9ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4f1de21ee1146b0bcd2eb6ebf07f9ab2021-02-01T10:59:16ZengAlexandria UniversityJournal of High Institute of Public Health2357-06012357-061X2011-09-0141335135810.21608/JHIPH.2011.20165The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During LaborFatma Ahmed Abo-Romia0Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of TantaBackground: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptive. The study was conducted at Elhelal Elahmar hospitals in Alexandria . Subjects and methods: A convenience sample of Eighty women with singleton pregnancies who went into spontaneous labor at term during the study period were included in the study. All participants were subjected to general examination, abdominal palpation and vaginal examination was performed to assess cervical effacement/length, dilatation, cervical position, consistency, membranes, liquor, presentation, position, caput, moulding and station. Perineal measurements (to the nearest 0.5 cm) were taken at the beginning of the active phase of labor (effacement of 80-100% and 3-4cm dilatation). The length of the perineum was determined as the distance between the fourchette and center of the anal orifice. Results: Comparison between women with perineal length  3.5 cm (group I) and those with perineal length > 3.5 cm (group II) revealed that women in GI had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and significantly higher frequency of perineal lacerations. Comparison between those with perineal lacerations (PL) and women without in those who didn't have episiotomy has shown that women with perineal lacerations had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and larger head circumferences of the newborn baby. Conclusions: Women with short perineal length are at increased risk of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Other factors associated with increased prevalence of perineal lacerations are prolonged 2nd stage of labor and increased neonatal head circumference.perineal length – perineal lacerations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia
spellingShingle Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
Journal of High Institute of Public Health
perineal length – perineal lacerations
author_facet Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia
author_sort Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia
title The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
title_short The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
title_full The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
title_fullStr The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
title_full_unstemmed The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
title_sort relation between perineal length and lacerations during labor
publisher Alexandria University
series Journal of High Institute of Public Health
issn 2357-0601
2357-061X
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Background: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptive. The study was conducted at Elhelal Elahmar hospitals in Alexandria . Subjects and methods: A convenience sample of Eighty women with singleton pregnancies who went into spontaneous labor at term during the study period were included in the study. All participants were subjected to general examination, abdominal palpation and vaginal examination was performed to assess cervical effacement/length, dilatation, cervical position, consistency, membranes, liquor, presentation, position, caput, moulding and station. Perineal measurements (to the nearest 0.5 cm) were taken at the beginning of the active phase of labor (effacement of 80-100% and 3-4cm dilatation). The length of the perineum was determined as the distance between the fourchette and center of the anal orifice. Results: Comparison between women with perineal length  3.5 cm (group I) and those with perineal length > 3.5 cm (group II) revealed that women in GI had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and significantly higher frequency of perineal lacerations. Comparison between those with perineal lacerations (PL) and women without in those who didn't have episiotomy has shown that women with perineal lacerations had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and larger head circumferences of the newborn baby. Conclusions: Women with short perineal length are at increased risk of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Other factors associated with increased prevalence of perineal lacerations are prolonged 2nd stage of labor and increased neonatal head circumference.
topic perineal length – perineal lacerations
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmaahmedaboromia therelationbetweenperineallengthandlacerationsduringlabor
AT fatmaahmedaboromia relationbetweenperineallengthandlacerationsduringlabor
_version_ 1724315486484692992