The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor
Background: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptiv...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Alexandria University
2011-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of High Institute of Public Health |
Subjects: |
id |
doaj-c4f1de21ee1146b0bcd2eb6ebf07f9ab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c4f1de21ee1146b0bcd2eb6ebf07f9ab2021-02-01T10:59:16ZengAlexandria UniversityJournal of High Institute of Public Health2357-06012357-061X2011-09-0141335135810.21608/JHIPH.2011.20165The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During LaborFatma Ahmed Abo-Romia0Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of TantaBackground: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptive. The study was conducted at Elhelal Elahmar hospitals in Alexandria . Subjects and methods: A convenience sample of Eighty women with singleton pregnancies who went into spontaneous labor at term during the study period were included in the study. All participants were subjected to general examination, abdominal palpation and vaginal examination was performed to assess cervical effacement/length, dilatation, cervical position, consistency, membranes, liquor, presentation, position, caput, moulding and station. Perineal measurements (to the nearest 0.5 cm) were taken at the beginning of the active phase of labor (effacement of 80-100% and 3-4cm dilatation). The length of the perineum was determined as the distance between the fourchette and center of the anal orifice. Results: Comparison between women with perineal length 3.5 cm (group I) and those with perineal length > 3.5 cm (group II) revealed that women in GI had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and significantly higher frequency of perineal lacerations. Comparison between those with perineal lacerations (PL) and women without in those who didn't have episiotomy has shown that women with perineal lacerations had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and larger head circumferences of the newborn baby. Conclusions: Women with short perineal length are at increased risk of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Other factors associated with increased prevalence of perineal lacerations are prolonged 2nd stage of labor and increased neonatal head circumference.perineal length – perineal lacerations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia |
spellingShingle |
Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor Journal of High Institute of Public Health perineal length – perineal lacerations |
author_facet |
Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia |
author_sort |
Fatma Ahmed Abo-Romia |
title |
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor |
title_short |
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor |
title_full |
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor |
title_fullStr |
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Relation Between Perineal Length and Lacerations During Labor |
title_sort |
relation between perineal length and lacerations during labor |
publisher |
Alexandria University |
series |
Journal of High Institute of Public Health |
issn |
2357-0601 2357-061X |
publishDate |
2011-09-01 |
description |
Background: Perineal length is thought to affect the risk of perineal lacerations in vaginally delivered
women Aim of research: to investigate the possible role of perineal length as a risk factor for
development of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Study design: correlation descriptive.
The study was conducted at Elhelal Elahmar hospitals in Alexandria . Subjects and methods: A
convenience sample of Eighty women with singleton pregnancies who went into spontaneous labor
at term during the study period were included in the study. All participants were subjected to general
examination, abdominal palpation and vaginal examination was performed to assess cervical
effacement/length, dilatation, cervical position, consistency, membranes, liquor, presentation,
position, caput, moulding and station. Perineal measurements (to the nearest 0.5 cm) were taken at
the beginning of the active phase of labor (effacement of 80-100% and 3-4cm dilatation). The length
of the perineum was determined as the distance between the fourchette and center of the anal
orifice. Results: Comparison between women with perineal length 3.5 cm (group I) and those with
perineal length > 3.5 cm (group II) revealed that women in GI had significantly longer 2nd stage of
labor and significantly higher frequency of perineal lacerations. Comparison between those with
perineal lacerations (PL) and women without in those who didn't have episiotomy has shown that
women with perineal lacerations had significantly longer 2nd stage of labor and larger head
circumferences of the newborn baby. Conclusions: Women with short perineal length are at
increased risk of perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. Other factors associated with increased
prevalence of perineal lacerations are prolonged 2nd stage of labor and increased neonatal head
circumference. |
topic |
perineal length – perineal lacerations |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fatmaahmedaboromia therelationbetweenperineallengthandlacerationsduringlabor AT fatmaahmedaboromia relationbetweenperineallengthandlacerationsduringlabor |
_version_ |
1724315486484692992 |