Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance
The purpose of this paper is to present a recently emerging evolutionary approach to the study of human organization that I will refer to as ‘naturalistic’, and to highlight its integrative potential for the social and administrative sciences. This naturalistic approach considers the various forms o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Bamberg Press
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Complexity, Governance & Networks |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/39 |
id |
doaj-c4eaf1df55b34ae5a368356d0e944ba5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c4eaf1df55b34ae5a368356d0e944ba52020-11-25T01:31:02ZengUniversity of Bamberg PressComplexity, Governance & Networks2214-29912214-30092017-01-010172110.20377/cgn-3936Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic GovernanceJ.W. Stoelhorst0University of AmsterdamThe purpose of this paper is to present a recently emerging evolutionary approach to the study of human organization that I will refer to as ‘naturalistic’, and to highlight its integrative potential for the social and administrative sciences. This naturalistic approach considers the various forms of human cooperation as products of gene-culture co-evolutionary processes, and in doing so goes to the heart of the collective action problems that are central to explaining the human condition. Moreover, in building empirically grounded explanations of human behavior and organization, it also offers an alternative to the traditional view of governance in economic theory, with its emphasis on decentralized exchange and rational self-interested choice. The naturalistic approach both explains why human nature has evolved to the point where we often can do ‘better than rational’ in the face of the social dilemmas underlying collective action problems, and why modern forms of social, economic, and political organization are nevertheless always prone to being undermined by these same dilemmas.https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/39collective actioninstitutional economicsevolutionary theorymulti-level selectiongene-culture co-evolution |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J.W. Stoelhorst |
spellingShingle |
J.W. Stoelhorst Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance Complexity, Governance & Networks collective action institutional economics evolutionary theory multi-level selection gene-culture co-evolution |
author_facet |
J.W. Stoelhorst |
author_sort |
J.W. Stoelhorst |
title |
Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance |
title_short |
Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance |
title_full |
Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance |
title_fullStr |
Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance |
title_sort |
better than rational: a naturalistic view of economic governance |
publisher |
University of Bamberg Press |
series |
Complexity, Governance & Networks |
issn |
2214-2991 2214-3009 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to present a recently emerging evolutionary approach to the study of human organization that I will refer to as ‘naturalistic’, and to highlight its integrative potential for the social and administrative sciences. This naturalistic approach considers the various forms of human cooperation as products of gene-culture co-evolutionary processes, and in doing so goes to the heart of the collective action problems that are central to explaining the human condition. Moreover, in building empirically grounded explanations of human behavior and organization, it also offers an alternative to the traditional view of governance in economic theory, with its emphasis on decentralized exchange and rational self-interested choice. The naturalistic approach both explains why human nature has evolved to the point where we often can do ‘better than rational’ in the face of the social dilemmas underlying collective action problems, and why modern forms of social, economic, and political organization are nevertheless always prone to being undermined by these same dilemmas. |
topic |
collective action institutional economics evolutionary theory multi-level selection gene-culture co-evolution |
url |
https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/cgn/article/view/39 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jwstoelhorst betterthanrationalanaturalisticviewofeconomicgovernance |
_version_ |
1725088194610855936 |