Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation

The local conventions can be defined as justifiable agreements negotiated between several stakeholders in a perspective of natural and environmental resources regulation - in terms of control, access, appropriation, usage and exploitation. In Sahel, although they are fashionable and enjoy more atten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: El hadj Touré
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2011-05-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/10863
id doaj-c4b383388042472495a5bfefac9f029b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4b383388042472495a5bfefac9f029b2021-10-05T12:33:22ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422011-05-0111110.4000/vertigo.10863Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriationEl hadj TouréThe local conventions can be defined as justifiable agreements negotiated between several stakeholders in a perspective of natural and environmental resources regulation - in terms of control, access, appropriation, usage and exploitation. In Sahel, although they are fashionable and enjoy more attention at the decision-makers, these instruments are still poorly considered in the current context of the decentralization (Diallo, 2003), like plans of occupation and affectation of grounds (POAS) experimented in the valley of the Senegal River. The aim of this paper is to question, from a survey led in a rural district with elected representatives, with technicians, with associative persons in charge and with users, the impact of this informal system, although formalized, of joint land management. The POAS, contributed to strengthen the capacities of the local elected representatives to act in their space, and farmers users to deliberate collectively on a stake so crucial as the agropastoral land tax. It was not however the object of an effective appropriation on behalf of these elected representatives in charge of its application, and these supposed users to follow the agreed operational rules. Between empowerment and problem of appropriation, the local conventions are left by tools necessary for a management shared by the common resources, and thus for a strengthened local governance.http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/10863Decentralizationlocal conventionsnatural resources managementplan of occupation and affectation of groundsempowermentproblem of appropriation.
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author El hadj Touré
spellingShingle El hadj Touré
Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
VertigO
Decentralization
local conventions
natural resources management
plan of occupation and affectation of grounds
empowerment
problem of appropriation.
author_facet El hadj Touré
author_sort El hadj Touré
title Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
title_short Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
title_full Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
title_fullStr Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
title_full_unstemmed Les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au Sénégal : Entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
title_sort les conventions locales pour la gestion des ressources naturelles au sénégal : entre autonomisation et problème d’appropriation
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
series VertigO
issn 1492-8442
publishDate 2011-05-01
description The local conventions can be defined as justifiable agreements negotiated between several stakeholders in a perspective of natural and environmental resources regulation - in terms of control, access, appropriation, usage and exploitation. In Sahel, although they are fashionable and enjoy more attention at the decision-makers, these instruments are still poorly considered in the current context of the decentralization (Diallo, 2003), like plans of occupation and affectation of grounds (POAS) experimented in the valley of the Senegal River. The aim of this paper is to question, from a survey led in a rural district with elected representatives, with technicians, with associative persons in charge and with users, the impact of this informal system, although formalized, of joint land management. The POAS, contributed to strengthen the capacities of the local elected representatives to act in their space, and farmers users to deliberate collectively on a stake so crucial as the agropastoral land tax. It was not however the object of an effective appropriation on behalf of these elected representatives in charge of its application, and these supposed users to follow the agreed operational rules. Between empowerment and problem of appropriation, the local conventions are left by tools necessary for a management shared by the common resources, and thus for a strengthened local governance.
topic Decentralization
local conventions
natural resources management
plan of occupation and affectation of grounds
empowerment
problem of appropriation.
url http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/10863
work_keys_str_mv AT elhadjtoure lesconventionslocalespourlagestiondesressourcesnaturellesausenegalentreautonomisationetproblemedappropriation
_version_ 1716843022422900736