Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes

Agricultural packaging has a direct impact on the environmental performance of food. The carbon footprint (CF) of two of the most used packaging systems for international transport by road of fruit and vegetables is assessed and compared. Corrugated cardboard boxes (CCB) and polypropylene foldable b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla, María José Bastante-Ceca, Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2552
id doaj-c4aeed9fa9f649ee881b8f2dc03e5c7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4aeed9fa9f649ee881b8f2dc03e5c7d2021-02-27T00:05:13ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-02-01132552255210.3390/su13052552Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish TomatoesVanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira0Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla1María José Bastante-Ceca2Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo3Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Alcoy, Universitat Politècnica de València, Plaza Ferrándiz y Carbonell 1, 03801 Alcoy, SpainProject Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, SpainProject Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, SpainProject Management, Innovation and Sustainability (PRINS) Research Centre, Campus de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, SpainAgricultural packaging has a direct impact on the environmental performance of food. The carbon footprint (CF) of two of the most used packaging systems for international transport by road of fruit and vegetables is assessed and compared. Corrugated cardboard boxes (CCB) and polypropylene foldable boxes (PPB) in two different sizes are the object of this study. For the reusable boxes, three different scenarios are considered regarding the number of uses of each box (20, 50, and 100 uses). Product CF ISO 14067:2018 standard is applied, and requirements of ISO 14026:2017 and ISO 14044:2006 are met for a cradle-to-grave CF analysis. Product distribution and return of the empty box are the stages with the most significant impact for PPB over the manufacturing stage. CCB that does not have any returning stage or requirements of sanitation has its main impact in manufacturing. The comparison between both packaging systems of the same size, considering the functional unit and defined scope, points out CCB has a lower CF than PPB.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2552greenhouse emissionsfruit and vegetable transportfruit and vegetable packagingcardboard boxespolypropylene boxes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira
Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla
María José Bastante-Ceca
Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
spellingShingle Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira
Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla
María José Bastante-Ceca
Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
Sustainability
greenhouse emissions
fruit and vegetable transport
fruit and vegetable packaging
cardboard boxes
polypropylene boxes
author_facet Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira
Rosario Viñoles-Cebolla
María José Bastante-Ceca
Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
author_sort Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira
title Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
title_short Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
title_full Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
title_fullStr Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Footprint Comparative Analysis of Cardboard and Plastic Containers Used for the International Transport of Spanish Tomatoes
title_sort carbon footprint comparative analysis of cardboard and plastic containers used for the international transport of spanish tomatoes
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Agricultural packaging has a direct impact on the environmental performance of food. The carbon footprint (CF) of two of the most used packaging systems for international transport by road of fruit and vegetables is assessed and compared. Corrugated cardboard boxes (CCB) and polypropylene foldable boxes (PPB) in two different sizes are the object of this study. For the reusable boxes, three different scenarios are considered regarding the number of uses of each box (20, 50, and 100 uses). Product CF ISO 14067:2018 standard is applied, and requirements of ISO 14026:2017 and ISO 14044:2006 are met for a cradle-to-grave CF analysis. Product distribution and return of the empty box are the stages with the most significant impact for PPB over the manufacturing stage. CCB that does not have any returning stage or requirements of sanitation has its main impact in manufacturing. The comparison between both packaging systems of the same size, considering the functional unit and defined scope, points out CCB has a lower CF than PPB.
topic greenhouse emissions
fruit and vegetable transport
fruit and vegetable packaging
cardboard boxes
polypropylene boxes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2552
work_keys_str_mv AT vanesagloiaconoferreira carbonfootprintcomparativeanalysisofcardboardandplasticcontainersusedfortheinternationaltransportofspanishtomatoes
AT rosariovinolescebolla carbonfootprintcomparativeanalysisofcardboardandplasticcontainersusedfortheinternationaltransportofspanishtomatoes
AT mariajosebastantececa carbonfootprintcomparativeanalysisofcardboardandplasticcontainersusedfortheinternationaltransportofspanishtomatoes
AT salvadorfcapuzrizo carbonfootprintcomparativeanalysisofcardboardandplasticcontainersusedfortheinternationaltransportofspanishtomatoes
_version_ 1724248752292626432