Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compre...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Geriatrics |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39 |
id |
doaj-c4931895feb540fea011ea6875fa5755 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c4931895feb540fea011ea6875fa57552020-11-25T03:57:41ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182009-08-01913910.1186/1471-2318-9-39Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistanceHaines TerrenceChari SatyanVarghese PaulEconomidis Alyssia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compression stockings and conventional socks, in order to determine any traction benefit.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Phase one involved slip resistance testing of two commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample through an independent blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.</p> <p>Phase two of the study involved in-situ testing among healthy adult subjects (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot conditions (bare feet, non-slip socks, conventional socks and compression stockings). Inclination was increased incrementally for each condition until slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phase one results generated through Wet Pendulum Test suggested that non-slip socks did not offer better traction than compression stockings. However, in phase two, slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles across all participants. Amongst the foot conditions tested, barefoot conditions produced the highest slip angles for all participants indicating that this foot condition provided the highest slip resistance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is evident that bare feet provide better slip resistance than non-slip socks and therefore might represent a safer foot condition. This study did not explore whether traction provided by bare feet was comparable to 'optimal' footwear such as shoes. However, previous studies have associated barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Therefore, it is suggested that all patients continue to be encouraged to mobilise in appropriate, well-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this study in relation to the testing method, participant group and sample size are discussed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Haines Terrence Chari Satyan Varghese Paul Economidis Alyssia |
spellingShingle |
Haines Terrence Chari Satyan Varghese Paul Economidis Alyssia Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance BMC Geriatrics |
author_facet |
Haines Terrence Chari Satyan Varghese Paul Economidis Alyssia |
author_sort |
Haines Terrence |
title |
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance |
title_short |
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance |
title_full |
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance |
title_fullStr |
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance |
title_sort |
are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? an analysis of slip resistance |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Geriatrics |
issn |
1471-2318 |
publishDate |
2009-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compression stockings and conventional socks, in order to determine any traction benefit.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Phase one involved slip resistance testing of two commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample through an independent blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.</p> <p>Phase two of the study involved in-situ testing among healthy adult subjects (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot conditions (bare feet, non-slip socks, conventional socks and compression stockings). Inclination was increased incrementally for each condition until slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phase one results generated through Wet Pendulum Test suggested that non-slip socks did not offer better traction than compression stockings. However, in phase two, slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles across all participants. Amongst the foot conditions tested, barefoot conditions produced the highest slip angles for all participants indicating that this foot condition provided the highest slip resistance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is evident that bare feet provide better slip resistance than non-slip socks and therefore might represent a safer foot condition. This study did not explore whether traction provided by bare feet was comparable to 'optimal' footwear such as shoes. However, previous studies have associated barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Therefore, it is suggested that all patients continue to be encouraged to mobilise in appropriate, well-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this study in relation to the testing method, participant group and sample size are discussed.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hainesterrence arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance AT charisatyan arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance AT varghesepaul arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance AT economidisalyssia arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance |
_version_ |
1724459269023072256 |