Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haines Terrence, Chari Satyan, Varghese Paul, Economidis Alyssia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-08-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39
id doaj-c4931895feb540fea011ea6875fa5755
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4931895feb540fea011ea6875fa57552020-11-25T03:57:41ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182009-08-01913910.1186/1471-2318-9-39Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistanceHaines TerrenceChari SatyanVarghese PaulEconomidis Alyssia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compression stockings and conventional socks, in order to determine any traction benefit.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Phase one involved slip resistance testing of two commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample through an independent blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.</p> <p>Phase two of the study involved in-situ testing among healthy adult subjects (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot conditions (bare feet, non-slip socks, conventional socks and compression stockings). Inclination was increased incrementally for each condition until slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phase one results generated through Wet Pendulum Test suggested that non-slip socks did not offer better traction than compression stockings. However, in phase two, slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles across all participants. Amongst the foot conditions tested, barefoot conditions produced the highest slip angles for all participants indicating that this foot condition provided the highest slip resistance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is evident that bare feet provide better slip resistance than non-slip socks and therefore might represent a safer foot condition. This study did not explore whether traction provided by bare feet was comparable to 'optimal' footwear such as shoes. However, previous studies have associated barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Therefore, it is suggested that all patients continue to be encouraged to mobilise in appropriate, well-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this study in relation to the testing method, participant group and sample size are discussed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haines Terrence
Chari Satyan
Varghese Paul
Economidis Alyssia
spellingShingle Haines Terrence
Chari Satyan
Varghese Paul
Economidis Alyssia
Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
BMC Geriatrics
author_facet Haines Terrence
Chari Satyan
Varghese Paul
Economidis Alyssia
author_sort Haines Terrence
title Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
title_short Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
title_full Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
title_fullStr Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
title_full_unstemmed Are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? An analysis of slip resistance
title_sort are non-slip socks really 'non-slip'? an analysis of slip resistance
publisher BMC
series BMC Geriatrics
issn 1471-2318
publishDate 2009-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Non-slip socks have been suggested as a means of preventing accidental falls due to slips. This study compared the relative slip resistance of commercially available non-slip socks with other foot conditions, namely bare feet, compression stockings and conventional socks, in order to determine any traction benefit.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Phase one involved slip resistance testing of two commercially available non-slip socks and one compression-stocking sample through an independent blinded materials testing laboratory using a Wet Pendulum Test.</p> <p>Phase two of the study involved in-situ testing among healthy adult subjects (n = 3). Subjects stood unsupported on a variable angle, inclined platform topped with hospital grade vinyl, in a range of foot conditions (bare feet, non-slip socks, conventional socks and compression stockings). Inclination was increased incrementally for each condition until slippage of any magnitude was detected. The platform angle was monitored using a spatial orientation tracking sensor and slippage point was recorded on video.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Phase one results generated through Wet Pendulum Test suggested that non-slip socks did not offer better traction than compression stockings. However, in phase two, slippage in compression stockings was detected at the lowest angles across all participants. Amongst the foot conditions tested, barefoot conditions produced the highest slip angles for all participants indicating that this foot condition provided the highest slip resistance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is evident that bare feet provide better slip resistance than non-slip socks and therefore might represent a safer foot condition. This study did not explore whether traction provided by bare feet was comparable to 'optimal' footwear such as shoes. However, previous studies have associated barefoot mobilisation with increased falls. Therefore, it is suggested that all patients continue to be encouraged to mobilise in appropriate, well-fitting shoes whilst in hospital. Limitations of this study in relation to the testing method, participant group and sample size are discussed.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/39
work_keys_str_mv AT hainesterrence arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance
AT charisatyan arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance
AT varghesepaul arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance
AT economidisalyssia arenonslipsocksreallynonslipananalysisofslipresistance
_version_ 1724459269023072256