The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application

Abstract Background Low aspiration volumes have been recommended to allow for higher concentrations of progenitor cells during bone marrow harvesting. However, these guidelines then require multiple aspiration attempts in order to maximize cellular yield. The purpose of this study was to investigate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas N. Muench, Cameron Kia, Alexander Otto, Julian Mehl, Joshua B. Baldino, Mark P. Cote, Mary Beth McCarthy, Knut Beitzel, Augustus D. Mazzocca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2924-2
id doaj-c48eb2bb91d94a7b812915b5f60fc4c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c48eb2bb91d94a7b812915b5f60fc4c82020-11-25T04:08:32ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-11-012011810.1186/s12891-019-2924-2The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical applicationLukas N. Muench0Cameron Kia1Alexander Otto2Julian Mehl3Joshua B. Baldino4Mark P. Cote5Mary Beth McCarthy6Knut Beitzel7Augustus D. Mazzocca8Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of ConnecticutAbstract Background Low aspiration volumes have been recommended to allow for higher concentrations of progenitor cells during bone marrow harvesting. However, these guidelines then require multiple aspiration attempts in order to maximize cellular yield. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a single, high-volume aspiration with four consecutive aliquots on the number of nucleated cells (NCs) and colony-forming units (CFUs) in concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) taken from the proximal humerus. Methods cBMA was taken from the proximal humerus of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Four 12-mL double syringes were used consecutively from a single trocar to obtain four 10 cc aliquots. Each then underwent centrifugation to create a fractionated layer rich in nucleated cells. Following cellular separation, NCs were counted and CFUs were evaluated after incubation of 7–10 days. Cellular comparisons between each aliquot were performed along with their interaction with patient age and sex. Results Twenty-nine patients (55.9 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. The number of NCs and CFUs showed significant differences between the four aliquots of aspirate, with the first 10 cc aliquot providing the highest amount (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were found between the sum of the three sequential aliquots compared to the initial 10 cc sample. There were no significant differences between male and female patients (p > 0.05). Increasing age resulted in no significant decrease in the number of NCs and CFUs across the four consecutive aliquots (p > 0.05). Conclusion In conclusion, while the initial aliquot provided the greatest number of nucleated cells and cultured CFUs, the addition of each sequential volume aspirate yielded similar amounts in total. This demonstrates the potential effectiveness of obtaining of higher volume aspirates from the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2924-2Bone marrow aspirationProximal humerusShoulder surgeryBiologic augmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lukas N. Muench
Cameron Kia
Alexander Otto
Julian Mehl
Joshua B. Baldino
Mark P. Cote
Mary Beth McCarthy
Knut Beitzel
Augustus D. Mazzocca
spellingShingle Lukas N. Muench
Cameron Kia
Alexander Otto
Julian Mehl
Joshua B. Baldino
Mark P. Cote
Mary Beth McCarthy
Knut Beitzel
Augustus D. Mazzocca
The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Bone marrow aspiration
Proximal humerus
Shoulder surgery
Biologic augmentation
author_facet Lukas N. Muench
Cameron Kia
Alexander Otto
Julian Mehl
Joshua B. Baldino
Mark P. Cote
Mary Beth McCarthy
Knut Beitzel
Augustus D. Mazzocca
author_sort Lukas N. Muench
title The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
title_short The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
title_full The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
title_fullStr The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
title_full_unstemmed The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
title_sort effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Background Low aspiration volumes have been recommended to allow for higher concentrations of progenitor cells during bone marrow harvesting. However, these guidelines then require multiple aspiration attempts in order to maximize cellular yield. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a single, high-volume aspiration with four consecutive aliquots on the number of nucleated cells (NCs) and colony-forming units (CFUs) in concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) taken from the proximal humerus. Methods cBMA was taken from the proximal humerus of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Four 12-mL double syringes were used consecutively from a single trocar to obtain four 10 cc aliquots. Each then underwent centrifugation to create a fractionated layer rich in nucleated cells. Following cellular separation, NCs were counted and CFUs were evaluated after incubation of 7–10 days. Cellular comparisons between each aliquot were performed along with their interaction with patient age and sex. Results Twenty-nine patients (55.9 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. The number of NCs and CFUs showed significant differences between the four aliquots of aspirate, with the first 10 cc aliquot providing the highest amount (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were found between the sum of the three sequential aliquots compared to the initial 10 cc sample. There were no significant differences between male and female patients (p > 0.05). Increasing age resulted in no significant decrease in the number of NCs and CFUs across the four consecutive aliquots (p > 0.05). Conclusion In conclusion, while the initial aliquot provided the greatest number of nucleated cells and cultured CFUs, the addition of each sequential volume aspirate yielded similar amounts in total. This demonstrates the potential effectiveness of obtaining of higher volume aspirates from the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair.
topic Bone marrow aspiration
Proximal humerus
Shoulder surgery
Biologic augmentation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2924-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasnmuench theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT cameronkia theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT alexanderotto theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT julianmehl theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT joshuabbaldino theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT markpcote theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT marybethmccarthy theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT knutbeitzel theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT augustusdmazzocca theeffectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT lukasnmuench effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT cameronkia effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT alexanderotto effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT julianmehl effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT joshuabbaldino effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT markpcote effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT marybethmccarthy effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT knutbeitzel effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
AT augustusdmazzocca effectofasingleconsecutivevolumeaspirationonconcentratedbonemarrowfromtheproximalhumerusforclinicalapplication
_version_ 1724425248259964928