Identity, Ontology, and Frege's Problem

It is argued that the semantic difference between sentences of the form "$a = a$" and "$a = b$" reflects a difference in their truth-makers. My account of these truth-makers combines a referential semantics -- singular terms are deemed to contribute nothing but their reference to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William J. Greenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova 2015-05-01
Series:Computer Science Journal of Moldova
Online Access:http://www.math.md/files/csjm/v23-n1/v23-n1-(pp85-91).pdf.pdf
Description
Summary:It is argued that the semantic difference between sentences of the form "$a = a$" and "$a = b$" reflects a difference in their truth-makers. My account of these truth-makers combines a referential semantics -- singular terms are deemed to contribute nothing but their reference to the meaning of sentences in which these occur -- with an ontology of logically complex individuals. Against analyses in which Fregean senses are invoked to account for the difference in meaning between (sentences of the form) ``$a = a$'' and ``$a = b$'', this ontology invokes an Aristotelian notion of \textit{identity as oneness in substance} as the source of this difference, rendering Fregean senses otiose.
ISSN:1561-4042