Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] This focused collection explores inequalities in the experiences of women in physics. Yet, it is important for researchers to also be aware of and draw insights from common patterns in the experiences of women across science, techn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah L. Eddy, Sara E. Brownell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2016-08-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
id doaj-c489fd60b0454aaf87ac59380ecac26e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c489fd60b0454aaf87ac59380ecac26e2020-11-24T22:33:27ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962016-08-0112202010610.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplinesSarah L. EddySara E. Brownell[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] This focused collection explores inequalities in the experiences of women in physics. Yet, it is important for researchers to also be aware of and draw insights from common patterns in the experiences of women across science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Here, we review studies on gender disparities across college STEM on measures that have been correlated with retention. These include disparities in academic performance, engagement, self-efficacy, belonging, and identity. We argue that observable factors such as persistence, performance, and engagement can inform researchers about what populations are disadvantaged in a STEM classroom or program, but we need to measure underlying mechanisms to understand how these inequalities arise. We present a framework that helps connect larger sociocultural factors, including stereotypes and gendered socialization, to student affect and observable behaviors in STEM contexts. We highlight four mechanisms that demonstrate how sociocultural factors could impact women in STEM classrooms and majors. We end with a set of recommendations for how we can more holistically evaluate the experiences of women in STEM to help mitigate the underlying inequities instead of applying a quick fix.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah L. Eddy
Sara E. Brownell
spellingShingle Sarah L. Eddy
Sara E. Brownell
Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Sarah L. Eddy
Sara E. Brownell
author_sort Sarah L. Eddy
title Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
title_short Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
title_full Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
title_fullStr Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
title_full_unstemmed Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
title_sort beneath the numbers: a review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2016-08-01
description [This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] This focused collection explores inequalities in the experiences of women in physics. Yet, it is important for researchers to also be aware of and draw insights from common patterns in the experiences of women across science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Here, we review studies on gender disparities across college STEM on measures that have been correlated with retention. These include disparities in academic performance, engagement, self-efficacy, belonging, and identity. We argue that observable factors such as persistence, performance, and engagement can inform researchers about what populations are disadvantaged in a STEM classroom or program, but we need to measure underlying mechanisms to understand how these inequalities arise. We present a framework that helps connect larger sociocultural factors, including stereotypes and gendered socialization, to student affect and observable behaviors in STEM contexts. We highlight four mechanisms that demonstrate how sociocultural factors could impact women in STEM classrooms and majors. We end with a set of recommendations for how we can more holistically evaluate the experiences of women in STEM to help mitigate the underlying inequities instead of applying a quick fix.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahleddy beneaththenumbersareviewofgenderdisparitiesinundergraduateeducationacrosssciencetechnologyengineeringandmathdisciplines
AT saraebrownell beneaththenumbersareviewofgenderdisparitiesinundergraduateeducationacrosssciencetechnologyengineeringandmathdisciplines
_version_ 1716504170211573760