Viability of Noncoplanar VMAT for liver SBRT compared with coplanar VMAT and beam orientation optimized 4π IMRT
Purpose: The 4π static noncoplanar radiation therapy delivery technique has demonstrated better normal tissue sparing and dose conformity than the clinically used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). It is unclear whether this is a fundamental limitation of VMAT delivery or the coplanar nature o...
Main Authors: | Kaley Woods, BS, Dan Nguyen, BS, Angelia Tran, BS, Victoria Y. Yu, BS, Minsong Cao, PhD, Tianye Niu, PhD, Percy Lee, MD, Ke Sheng, PhD |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210941500010X |
Similar Items
-
Predicting liver SBRT eligibility and plan quality for VMAT and 4π plans
by: Angelia Tran, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
by: Zheng Lao PhD, MD, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
The Study of VMAT, IMRT and Hybrid IMRT/VMAT Techniques for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
by: PHAM, HUU-THIEN, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator
by: Zike Huang MS, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
by: Kaley Woods, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)