The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?

Abstract Objectives This finite element analysis was conducted to study the effects produced by a new fixed functional appliance (EFA; Elhiny functional appliance) and hence predict its clinical effectiveness. Materials/methods Under ANSYS environment, a simplified 2D finite element model was prepar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omnia A. Elhiny, Mohamed I. El-Anwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-11-01
Series:Bulletin of the National Research Centre
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42269-018-0024-3
id doaj-c4706735189b4e7c9bb1fde27509b17a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4706735189b4e7c9bb1fde27509b17a2020-11-25T01:53:19ZengSpringerOpenBulletin of the National Research Centre2522-83072018-11-014211610.1186/s42269-018-0024-3The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?Omnia A. Elhiny0Mohamed I. El-Anwar1Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department, National Research CentreMechanical Engineering Department, National Research CentreAbstract Objectives This finite element analysis was conducted to study the effects produced by a new fixed functional appliance (EFA; Elhiny functional appliance) and hence predict its clinical effectiveness. Materials/methods Under ANSYS environment, a simplified 2D finite element model was prepared for this study. The models simulated a clinical situation where the mandible was positioned forward via a new fixed functional appliance design. The models’ components were created on a commercial CAD/CAM package then imported to finite element software. Pushing load of 2 N was applied along the appliance longitudinal direction. Results The mandible showed downward and forward deformation in the X and Y directions with the highest deformation at the symphysis and lower border with a total deformation of 80 μm. There was little deformation in the maxilla. The highest strain results were at the condyle, both compressive and tensile in the X and Y directions with a total of 1520 micro strain behind the condyle. The strain in the mandibular tooth bearing area was around zero and in the maxillary tooth bearing area ranged from − 9 to 16.6 micro strain. Conclusions Within the limitations of this finite element analysis, it could be predicted that the new appliance (EFA) produces pure functional skeletal results with absolutely no dentoalveolar effects, which provides the opportunity for observing significant skeletal changes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42269-018-0024-3Finite element analysisFixed functional appliancesBiomechanical effectsMandibular growth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omnia A. Elhiny
Mohamed I. El-Anwar
spellingShingle Omnia A. Elhiny
Mohamed I. El-Anwar
The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
Bulletin of the National Research Centre
Finite element analysis
Fixed functional appliances
Biomechanical effects
Mandibular growth
author_facet Omnia A. Elhiny
Mohamed I. El-Anwar
author_sort Omnia A. Elhiny
title The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
title_short The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
title_full The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
title_fullStr The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
title_full_unstemmed The dilemma of functional therapy: the new EFA to do or not to do?
title_sort dilemma of functional therapy: the new efa to do or not to do?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Bulletin of the National Research Centre
issn 2522-8307
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Objectives This finite element analysis was conducted to study the effects produced by a new fixed functional appliance (EFA; Elhiny functional appliance) and hence predict its clinical effectiveness. Materials/methods Under ANSYS environment, a simplified 2D finite element model was prepared for this study. The models simulated a clinical situation where the mandible was positioned forward via a new fixed functional appliance design. The models’ components were created on a commercial CAD/CAM package then imported to finite element software. Pushing load of 2 N was applied along the appliance longitudinal direction. Results The mandible showed downward and forward deformation in the X and Y directions with the highest deformation at the symphysis and lower border with a total deformation of 80 μm. There was little deformation in the maxilla. The highest strain results were at the condyle, both compressive and tensile in the X and Y directions with a total of 1520 micro strain behind the condyle. The strain in the mandibular tooth bearing area was around zero and in the maxillary tooth bearing area ranged from − 9 to 16.6 micro strain. Conclusions Within the limitations of this finite element analysis, it could be predicted that the new appliance (EFA) produces pure functional skeletal results with absolutely no dentoalveolar effects, which provides the opportunity for observing significant skeletal changes.
topic Finite element analysis
Fixed functional appliances
Biomechanical effects
Mandibular growth
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42269-018-0024-3
work_keys_str_mv AT omniaaelhiny thedilemmaoffunctionaltherapythenewefatodoornottodo
AT mohamedielanwar thedilemmaoffunctionaltherapythenewefatodoornottodo
AT omniaaelhiny dilemmaoffunctionaltherapythenewefatodoornottodo
AT mohamedielanwar dilemmaoffunctionaltherapythenewefatodoornottodo
_version_ 1724991696974905344