The diagnostic accuracy of conventional forceps biopsy compared to ESD
conventional forceps biopsy (CFB) is the most popular way to screen for gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN). Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between conventional forceps biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
Main Authors: | Wu Shimin, Zhu Xinjian, Xiang Lijuan, Chen Jianqiang, Chen Chunxiao |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Open Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0039 |
Similar Items
-
Changes of biochemical structure of gastric mucosa with intraepithelial neoplasia by fiber Raman system
by: LUAN Zhaohui, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Novel Slim Biopsy Forceps with Conventional Biopsy Forceps for Biliary Stricture: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
by: Eun Suk Jung, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
The diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy versus forceps biopsy of malignant endobronchial lesions
by: Ahmed Sh. Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy-guided forceps biopsy and the feasibility of esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluation of hypopharyngeal cancer
by: Hyun Jun Hong, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Thoracoscopic pleural cryobiopsy versus conventional forceps biopsy in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion of unknown etiology
by: Randa S. E. Muhammad, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)