Human experimental anxiety: actual public speaking induces more intense physiological responses than simulated public speaking

• Main Authors: Antonio Waldo Zuardi, José Alexandre de Souza Crippa, Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak, Ricardo Gorayeb
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) 2013-09-01
• Series: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
• Subjects: Experimental anxiety; public speaking; simulated; real-world; meta-analysis
• Online Access: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462013000300248&lng=en&tlng=en

Objectives: a) To perform a systematic and meta-analytic review to verify whether the Simulated Public Speaking Task (SPST) leads to a greater increase in self-rated anxiety than in physiological correlates of anxiety; and b) to compare the results obtained with the SPST with an actual public speaking task involving healthy volunteers. Methods: a) The PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies involving the SPST prior to 2012. Eleven publications were eligible and provided data from 143 healthy volunteers for meta-analysis; b) 48 university students without somatic or psychiatric disorders were divided into three experimental groups of 16 subjects to undergo one of the following: SPST, real-world public speaking task (real-world), and control situation (control). Results: The meta-analysis showed that the SPST induced a significant increase in the Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAMS) anxiety factor, but no significant increases in systolic blood pressure or heart rate. The empirical study showed that the real-world public speaking task increased heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure significantly more than the control and SPST conditions. Conclusions: These results suggest that real public speaking might be better than SPST in inducing experimental anxiety.