Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer

Objectives: In this study, we examined the value of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination(DRE) in prostate cancer detection among men.Materials and methods: Between January 2006 and July2011, transrectal prostate needle biopsy was performedin 349 patients with abnormal DRE an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harun Çıralık, Remziye Eren, Mustafa Eren, Mustafa Remzi Bahar, Bülent Altunoluk, Sefa Resim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Modestum Publishing LTD 2012-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/8/JCEI-00433.pdf
id doaj-c441c116d3544e7ca0aa0c4f6739ac67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c441c116d3544e7ca0aa0c4f6739ac672021-09-02T04:11:19ZengModestum Publishing LTDJournal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations1309-85781309-66212012-03-01316670Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancerHarun ÇıralıkRemziye ErenMustafa ErenMustafa Remzi BaharBülent AltunolukSefa ResimObjectives: In this study, we examined the value of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination(DRE) in prostate cancer detection among men.Materials and methods: Between January 2006 and July2011, transrectal prostate needle biopsy was performedin 349 patients with abnormal DRE and/or >4ng/ml serumtotal PSA level were involved in the study. According tothe histopathological examination, the patients were dividedinto two groups as without and with prostate cancerand their data were compared.Results: At the end of the histopathological examination,121 (32.4%) cases had prostate cancer and 252 (67.6%)cases found without prostate cancer. Mean age and meanPSA values were higher and prostate volume was lowerin the prostate cancer group than the other group. Prostatecancer was detected in 73 of the patients (66.4%)whose DRE was abnormal. In prostate cancer group,Gleason scores of 47 patients’ (38.8%) were “6”, Gleasonscores of 42 patients’ (34.7%) were “ 7” and Gleasonscores of 32 patients’ (26.5%) were between 8 and 10.Positive predictive values for high serum total PSA level(>4 ng/ml) and abnormal DRE were found as 39.7% and66.4% respectively.Conclusions: Only serum total PSA measurement oronly DRE is inadequate differential methods for differentiationof benign and malign prostate diseases. WhenDRE was assessed with serum total PSA level, cancerdetection rate and reliability increases. J Clin Exp Invest2012; 3(1): 66-70http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/8/JCEI-00433.pdfProstate cancerprostate biopsyprostate specific antigendigital rectal examination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harun Çıralık
Remziye Eren
Mustafa Eren
Mustafa Remzi Bahar
Bülent Altunoluk
Sefa Resim
spellingShingle Harun Çıralık
Remziye Eren
Mustafa Eren
Mustafa Remzi Bahar
Bülent Altunoluk
Sefa Resim
Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
Prostate cancer
prostate biopsy
prostate specific antigen
digital rectal examination
author_facet Harun Çıralık
Remziye Eren
Mustafa Eren
Mustafa Remzi Bahar
Bülent Altunoluk
Sefa Resim
author_sort Harun Çıralık
title Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
title_short Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
title_full Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
title_sort evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of prostate cancer
publisher Modestum Publishing LTD
series Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations
issn 1309-8578
1309-6621
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Objectives: In this study, we examined the value of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination(DRE) in prostate cancer detection among men.Materials and methods: Between January 2006 and July2011, transrectal prostate needle biopsy was performedin 349 patients with abnormal DRE and/or >4ng/ml serumtotal PSA level were involved in the study. According tothe histopathological examination, the patients were dividedinto two groups as without and with prostate cancerand their data were compared.Results: At the end of the histopathological examination,121 (32.4%) cases had prostate cancer and 252 (67.6%)cases found without prostate cancer. Mean age and meanPSA values were higher and prostate volume was lowerin the prostate cancer group than the other group. Prostatecancer was detected in 73 of the patients (66.4%)whose DRE was abnormal. In prostate cancer group,Gleason scores of 47 patients’ (38.8%) were “6”, Gleasonscores of 42 patients’ (34.7%) were “ 7” and Gleasonscores of 32 patients’ (26.5%) were between 8 and 10.Positive predictive values for high serum total PSA level(>4 ng/ml) and abnormal DRE were found as 39.7% and66.4% respectively.Conclusions: Only serum total PSA measurement oronly DRE is inadequate differential methods for differentiationof benign and malign prostate diseases. WhenDRE was assessed with serum total PSA level, cancerdetection rate and reliability increases. J Clin Exp Invest2012; 3(1): 66-70
topic Prostate cancer
prostate biopsy
prostate specific antigen
digital rectal examination
url http://www.jceionline.org/upload/sayi/8/JCEI-00433.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT haruncıralık evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
AT remziyeeren evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
AT mustafaeren evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
AT mustafaremzibahar evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
AT bulentaltunoluk evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
AT sefaresim evaluationoftheroleofdigitalrectalexaminationandprostatespecificantigenindiagnosisofprostatecancer
_version_ 1721180396768460800