Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century
One of the aspects of the development of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century was the selection and formation of regional architectural restoration schools. The purpose of the study: to identify the features of the leading schools of Russian architectural restoration in the twe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_05019.pdf |
id |
doaj-c41ce56f6e214688abf65cdd42b7b715 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c41ce56f6e214688abf65cdd42b7b7152021-02-02T08:48:29ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011640501910.1051/e3sconf/202016405019e3sconf_tpacee2020_05019Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX centuryShumilkin Aleksandr0Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil EngineeringOne of the aspects of the development of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century was the selection and formation of regional architectural restoration schools. The purpose of the study: to identify the features of the leading schools of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century. Methods: a comprehensive study, comparative analysis of architectural and restoration practices of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools based on the generalization of bibliographic material. Results: the role of architectural and restoration schools in the development of scientific theory and practice of restoration in the twentieth century is Revealed.the features of restoration techniques and methodological approaches of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools are Analyzed. The influence of the typological and architectural and artistic context, the degree of its preservation, on the specifics of architectural and restoration activities of individual schools is revealed. The prevailing types of restoration (integral, fragmentary, compromise, synthetic) at the main stages of formation of domestic restoration schools are determined.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_05019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shumilkin Aleksandr |
spellingShingle |
Shumilkin Aleksandr Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Shumilkin Aleksandr |
author_sort |
Shumilkin Aleksandr |
title |
Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century |
title_short |
Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century |
title_full |
Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century |
title_fullStr |
Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century |
title_full_unstemmed |
Domestic schools of architectural restoration in the XX century |
title_sort |
domestic schools of architectural restoration in the xx century |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
One of the aspects of the development of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century was the selection and formation of regional architectural restoration schools. The purpose of the study: to identify the features of the leading schools of Russian architectural restoration in the twentieth century. Methods: a comprehensive study, comparative analysis of architectural and restoration practices of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools based on the generalization of bibliographic material. Results: the role of architectural and restoration schools in the development of scientific theory and practice of restoration in the twentieth century is Revealed.the features of restoration techniques and methodological approaches of Moscow, Novgorod, Vladimir-Suzdal, Leningrad, Pskov restoration schools are Analyzed. The influence of the typological and architectural and artistic context, the degree of its preservation, on the specifics of architectural and restoration activities of individual schools is revealed. The prevailing types of restoration (integral, fragmentary, compromise, synthetic) at the main stages of formation of domestic restoration schools are determined. |
url |
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/24/e3sconf_tpacee2020_05019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shumilkinaleksandr domesticschoolsofarchitecturalrestorationinthexxcentury |
_version_ |
1724296384300974080 |