Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor

The practice of conservation through displacement has become commonplace in developing countries. However, resettlement programs remain at very low standards as government policies only focus on economic-based compensation which often excludes socially and economically marginalised groups. In this p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lai Ming Lam, Saumik Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Conservation & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2014;volume=12;issue=1;spage=65;epage=76;aulast=Lam
id doaj-c3fa56518bdf4664b68dd30f6a14326e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3fa56518bdf4664b68dd30f6a14326e2020-11-25T01:45:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49232014-01-01121657610.4103/0972-4923.132132Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the PoorLai Ming LamSaumik PaulThe practice of conservation through displacement has become commonplace in developing countries. However, resettlement programs remain at very low standards as government policies only focus on economic-based compensation which often excludes socially and economically marginalised groups. In this paper, based on a case study of the displaced indigenous people, the Rana Tharus, from the Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve in Nepal, we argue that compensation as a panacea is a myth as it does not effectively replace the loss of livelihoods. This is particularly the case when the indigenous community′s customary rights to land are not legally protected. Our ethnographic data support the contention that the history of social exclusion is rooted in the land reform and settlement policies, which deprived the Rana Tharus of proper land rights. The present land compensation scheme resulted in a ′double whammy′ on indigenous forest dwellers. The legal land title holders on average received less than 60% of their land. Moreover, due to the poor quality of soil in the resettlement areas the average crop yield was less than half the quantity produced before displacement. While economic indicators show widespread impoverishment with less food security, low agricultural productivity, and landlessness, social indicators suggest depletion of social capital in the resettled communities where there are less job opportunities and less social networks. Our study indicates that along with compensation, the concept of ′livelihood restoration′ should also be fully implemented in any resettlement program to prevent further impoverishment.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2014;volume=12;issue=1;spage=65;epage=76;aulast=Lamconservation-led-displacementland compensationindigenous groupspovertyNepalAsia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lai Ming Lam
Saumik Paul
spellingShingle Lai Ming Lam
Saumik Paul
Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
Conservation & Society
conservation-led-displacement
land compensation
indigenous groups
poverty
Nepal
Asia
author_facet Lai Ming Lam
Saumik Paul
author_sort Lai Ming Lam
title Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
title_short Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
title_full Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
title_fullStr Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
title_full_unstemmed Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement: A Double Whammy on the Poor
title_sort disputed land rights and conservation-led displacement: a double whammy on the poor
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Conservation & Society
issn 0972-4923
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The practice of conservation through displacement has become commonplace in developing countries. However, resettlement programs remain at very low standards as government policies only focus on economic-based compensation which often excludes socially and economically marginalised groups. In this paper, based on a case study of the displaced indigenous people, the Rana Tharus, from the Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve in Nepal, we argue that compensation as a panacea is a myth as it does not effectively replace the loss of livelihoods. This is particularly the case when the indigenous community′s customary rights to land are not legally protected. Our ethnographic data support the contention that the history of social exclusion is rooted in the land reform and settlement policies, which deprived the Rana Tharus of proper land rights. The present land compensation scheme resulted in a ′double whammy′ on indigenous forest dwellers. The legal land title holders on average received less than 60% of their land. Moreover, due to the poor quality of soil in the resettlement areas the average crop yield was less than half the quantity produced before displacement. While economic indicators show widespread impoverishment with less food security, low agricultural productivity, and landlessness, social indicators suggest depletion of social capital in the resettled communities where there are less job opportunities and less social networks. Our study indicates that along with compensation, the concept of ′livelihood restoration′ should also be fully implemented in any resettlement program to prevent further impoverishment.
topic conservation-led-displacement
land compensation
indigenous groups
poverty
Nepal
Asia
url http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2014;volume=12;issue=1;spage=65;epage=76;aulast=Lam
work_keys_str_mv AT laiminglam disputedlandrightsandconservationleddisplacementadoublewhammyonthepoor
AT saumikpaul disputedlandrightsandconservationleddisplacementadoublewhammyonthepoor
_version_ 1725023312308862976