The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change

The changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken agai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Lamond, Edmund Penning-Rowsell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-01-01
Series:Climate Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072
id doaj-c3bfbf456d1c45379c51b17a0ac8bcf7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3bfbf456d1c45379c51b17a0ac8bcf72020-11-24T23:00:46ZengElsevierClimate Risk Management2212-09632014-01-012C11010.1016/j.crm.2014.03.001The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate changeJessica Lamond0Edmund Penning-Rowsell1Centre for Floods, Communities and Resilience, University of the West of England, Faculty of Environment and Technology, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UKFlood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Bramley Road, London N14 4YZ, UKThe changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken against three broad criteria for the functioning and sustainability of a flood insurance scheme: knowing the nature of the insurable risk; the availability of an insurable population; and the presence of a solvent insurer. The solvency of insurance markets appears strong, partly because insurers and reinsurers can choose to exclude markets which would give rise to insolvency or can diversify their portfolios to include offsetting perils. Changing risk may threaten solvency if increasing risk is not recognised and adjusted for but insurability of flood risk may be facilitated by the use of market based and hybrid schemes offering greater diversification and more flexibility. While encouragement of mitigation is in theory boosted by risk based pricing, availability and affordability of insurance may be negatively impacted. This threatens the sustainability of an insurable population, therefore the inclusion of the state in partnership is beneficial in ensuring continuity of cover, addressing equity issues and incentivising mitigation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072Insurance and riskFloods/prediction planningAdaptationClimate changeDisaster risk reduction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica Lamond
Edmund Penning-Rowsell
spellingShingle Jessica Lamond
Edmund Penning-Rowsell
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
Climate Risk Management
Insurance and risk
Floods/prediction planning
Adaptation
Climate change
Disaster risk reduction
author_facet Jessica Lamond
Edmund Penning-Rowsell
author_sort Jessica Lamond
title The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
title_short The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
title_full The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
title_fullStr The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
title_full_unstemmed The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
title_sort robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
publisher Elsevier
series Climate Risk Management
issn 2212-0963
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken against three broad criteria for the functioning and sustainability of a flood insurance scheme: knowing the nature of the insurable risk; the availability of an insurable population; and the presence of a solvent insurer. The solvency of insurance markets appears strong, partly because insurers and reinsurers can choose to exclude markets which would give rise to insolvency or can diversify their portfolios to include offsetting perils. Changing risk may threaten solvency if increasing risk is not recognised and adjusted for but insurability of flood risk may be facilitated by the use of market based and hybrid schemes offering greater diversification and more flexibility. While encouragement of mitigation is in theory boosted by risk based pricing, availability and affordability of insurance may be negatively impacted. This threatens the sustainability of an insurable population, therefore the inclusion of the state in partnership is beneficial in ensuring continuity of cover, addressing equity issues and incentivising mitigation.
topic Insurance and risk
Floods/prediction planning
Adaptation
Climate change
Disaster risk reduction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicalamond therobustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange
AT edmundpenningrowsell therobustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange
AT jessicalamond robustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange
AT edmundpenningrowsell robustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange
_version_ 1725641195212767232