The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change
The changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken agai...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Climate Risk Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072 |
id |
doaj-c3bfbf456d1c45379c51b17a0ac8bcf7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c3bfbf456d1c45379c51b17a0ac8bcf72020-11-24T23:00:46ZengElsevierClimate Risk Management2212-09632014-01-012C11010.1016/j.crm.2014.03.001The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate changeJessica Lamond0Edmund Penning-Rowsell1Centre for Floods, Communities and Resilience, University of the West of England, Faculty of Environment and Technology, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UKFlood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Bramley Road, London N14 4YZ, UKThe changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken against three broad criteria for the functioning and sustainability of a flood insurance scheme: knowing the nature of the insurable risk; the availability of an insurable population; and the presence of a solvent insurer. The solvency of insurance markets appears strong, partly because insurers and reinsurers can choose to exclude markets which would give rise to insolvency or can diversify their portfolios to include offsetting perils. Changing risk may threaten solvency if increasing risk is not recognised and adjusted for but insurability of flood risk may be facilitated by the use of market based and hybrid schemes offering greater diversification and more flexibility. While encouragement of mitigation is in theory boosted by risk based pricing, availability and affordability of insurance may be negatively impacted. This threatens the sustainability of an insurable population, therefore the inclusion of the state in partnership is beneficial in ensuring continuity of cover, addressing equity issues and incentivising mitigation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072Insurance and riskFloods/prediction planningAdaptationClimate changeDisaster risk reduction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jessica Lamond Edmund Penning-Rowsell |
spellingShingle |
Jessica Lamond Edmund Penning-Rowsell The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change Climate Risk Management Insurance and risk Floods/prediction planning Adaptation Climate change Disaster risk reduction |
author_facet |
Jessica Lamond Edmund Penning-Rowsell |
author_sort |
Jessica Lamond |
title |
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
title_short |
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
title_full |
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
title_fullStr |
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
title_full_unstemmed |
The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
title_sort |
robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Climate Risk Management |
issn |
2212-0963 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The changing risk of flooding associated with climate change presents different challenges for the different flood insurance market models in use around the world, which vary in respect of consumer structure and their risk transfer mechanism. A review of international models has been undertaken against three broad criteria for the functioning and sustainability of a flood insurance scheme: knowing the nature of the insurable risk; the availability of an insurable population; and the presence of a solvent insurer. The solvency of insurance markets appears strong, partly because insurers and reinsurers can choose to exclude markets which would give rise to insolvency or can diversify their portfolios to include offsetting perils. Changing risk may threaten solvency if increasing risk is not recognised and adjusted for but insurability of flood risk may be facilitated by the use of market based and hybrid schemes offering greater diversification and more flexibility. While encouragement of mitigation is in theory boosted by risk based pricing, availability and affordability of insurance may be negatively impacted. This threatens the sustainability of an insurable population, therefore the inclusion of the state in partnership is beneficial in ensuring continuity of cover, addressing equity issues and incentivising mitigation. |
topic |
Insurance and risk Floods/prediction planning Adaptation Climate change Disaster risk reduction |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096314000072 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jessicalamond therobustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange AT edmundpenningrowsell therobustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange AT jessicalamond robustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange AT edmundpenningrowsell robustnessoffloodinsuranceregimesgivenchangingriskresultingfromclimatechange |
_version_ |
1725641195212767232 |