Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints

The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient ab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Scribante, Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Simona Broggini, Marina D'Allocco, Paola Gandini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356
id doaj-c3bef12676e240c1ba83a55340631a54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3bef12676e240c1ba83a55340631a542020-11-25T01:07:31ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362011-01-01201110.1155/2011/548356548356Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite SplintsAndrea Scribante0Maria Francesca Sfondrini1Simona Broggini2Marina D'Allocco3Paola Gandini4Department of Orthodontics and Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, ItalyDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, ItalyThe purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired 𝑡-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Scribante
Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Simona Broggini
Marina D'Allocco
Paola Gandini
spellingShingle Andrea Scribante
Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Simona Broggini
Marina D'Allocco
Paola Gandini
Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Andrea Scribante
Maria Francesca Sfondrini
Simona Broggini
Marina D'Allocco
Paola Gandini
author_sort Andrea Scribante
title Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_short Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_full Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_fullStr Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_sort efficacy of esthetic retainers: clinical comparison between multistranded wires and direct-bond glass fiber-reinforced composite splints
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired 𝑡-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356
work_keys_str_mv AT andreascribante efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT mariafrancescasfondrini efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT simonabroggini efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT marinadallocco efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT paolagandini efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
_version_ 1725186847838044160