An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
Graphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were no...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Nanomaterials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603 |
id |
doaj-c3afb2f7c47642fd929c4a8c64a03394 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c3afb2f7c47642fd929c4a8c64a033942020-11-25T01:03:49ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912018-08-018860310.3390/nano8080603nano8080603An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil RecoveryAlbert Barrabino0Torleif Holt1Erik Lindeberg2Petroleum Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayPetroleum Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayCO<sub>2</sub> Technology, NO-7030 Trondheim, NorwayGraphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were not able to stabilize foams. The inability of nanographene oxide for stabilizing foams was explained by the increase of hydrophilicity due to size decrease, while for partially reduced graphene oxide, the high degree of reduction of the material was considered to be the reason. Graphene oxide brine dispersions showed immediate gel formation, which improved foam stability. Particle growth due to layer stacking was also observed. This mechanism was detrimental for foam stabilization. Gel formation and particle growth caused these particles to block pores and not being filterable. The work indicates that the particles studied are not suitable for CO2 enhanced oil recovery purposes.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603enhanced oil recoverygraphene oxideCO2 foamaquifer storagemobility control |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Albert Barrabino Torleif Holt Erik Lindeberg |
spellingShingle |
Albert Barrabino Torleif Holt Erik Lindeberg An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery Nanomaterials enhanced oil recovery graphene oxide CO2 foam aquifer storage mobility control |
author_facet |
Albert Barrabino Torleif Holt Erik Lindeberg |
author_sort |
Albert Barrabino |
title |
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery |
title_short |
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery |
title_full |
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery |
title_fullStr |
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery |
title_sort |
evaluation of graphene oxides as possible foam stabilizing agents for co2 based enhanced oil recovery |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nanomaterials |
issn |
2079-4991 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
Graphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were not able to stabilize foams. The inability of nanographene oxide for stabilizing foams was explained by the increase of hydrophilicity due to size decrease, while for partially reduced graphene oxide, the high degree of reduction of the material was considered to be the reason. Graphene oxide brine dispersions showed immediate gel formation, which improved foam stability. Particle growth due to layer stacking was also observed. This mechanism was detrimental for foam stabilization. Gel formation and particle growth caused these particles to block pores and not being filterable. The work indicates that the particles studied are not suitable for CO2 enhanced oil recovery purposes. |
topic |
enhanced oil recovery graphene oxide CO2 foam aquifer storage mobility control |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albertbarrabino anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery AT torleifholt anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery AT eriklindeberg anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery AT albertbarrabino evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery AT torleifholt evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery AT eriklindeberg evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery |
_version_ |
1725199336693825536 |