An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery

Graphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albert Barrabino, Torleif Holt, Erik Lindeberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Nanomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603
id doaj-c3afb2f7c47642fd929c4a8c64a03394
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3afb2f7c47642fd929c4a8c64a033942020-11-25T01:03:49ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912018-08-018860310.3390/nano8080603nano8080603An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil RecoveryAlbert Barrabino0Torleif Holt1Erik Lindeberg2Petroleum Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayPetroleum Department, SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayCO<sub>2</sub> Technology, NO-7030 Trondheim, NorwayGraphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were not able to stabilize foams. The inability of nanographene oxide for stabilizing foams was explained by the increase of hydrophilicity due to size decrease, while for partially reduced graphene oxide, the high degree of reduction of the material was considered to be the reason. Graphene oxide brine dispersions showed immediate gel formation, which improved foam stability. Particle growth due to layer stacking was also observed. This mechanism was detrimental for foam stabilization. Gel formation and particle growth caused these particles to block pores and not being filterable. The work indicates that the particles studied are not suitable for CO2 enhanced oil recovery purposes.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603enhanced oil recoverygraphene oxideCO2 foamaquifer storagemobility control
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Albert Barrabino
Torleif Holt
Erik Lindeberg
spellingShingle Albert Barrabino
Torleif Holt
Erik Lindeberg
An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
Nanomaterials
enhanced oil recovery
graphene oxide
CO2 foam
aquifer storage
mobility control
author_facet Albert Barrabino
Torleif Holt
Erik Lindeberg
author_sort Albert Barrabino
title An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_short An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_full An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Graphene Oxides as Possible Foam Stabilizing Agents for CO2 Based Enhanced Oil Recovery
title_sort evaluation of graphene oxides as possible foam stabilizing agents for co2 based enhanced oil recovery
publisher MDPI AG
series Nanomaterials
issn 2079-4991
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Graphene oxide, nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide have been studied as possible foam stabilizing agents for CO2 based enhanced oil recovery. Graphene oxide was able to stabilize CO2/synthetic sea water foams, while nanographene oxide and partially reduced graphene oxide were not able to stabilize foams. The inability of nanographene oxide for stabilizing foams was explained by the increase of hydrophilicity due to size decrease, while for partially reduced graphene oxide, the high degree of reduction of the material was considered to be the reason. Graphene oxide brine dispersions showed immediate gel formation, which improved foam stability. Particle growth due to layer stacking was also observed. This mechanism was detrimental for foam stabilization. Gel formation and particle growth caused these particles to block pores and not being filterable. The work indicates that the particles studied are not suitable for CO2 enhanced oil recovery purposes.
topic enhanced oil recovery
graphene oxide
CO2 foam
aquifer storage
mobility control
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/8/603
work_keys_str_mv AT albertbarrabino anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
AT torleifholt anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
AT eriklindeberg anevaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
AT albertbarrabino evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
AT torleifholt evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
AT eriklindeberg evaluationofgrapheneoxidesaspossiblefoamstabilizingagentsforco2basedenhancedoilrecovery
_version_ 1725199336693825536