Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The literature for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) demonstrates significant improvements in patient- reported outcomes. While these reports focus on the overall study population, it is clear that some patients do not have a successful outcome. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John R. Steele MD, Daniel J. Cunningham MD, James K. DeOrio MD, James A. Nunley MD, Mark E. Easley MD, Samuel B. Adams MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-10-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00408
id doaj-c390cc64f1174d5a88a698b9c996e394
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c390cc64f1174d5a88a698b9c996e3942020-11-25T03:11:34ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142019-10-01410.1177/2473011419S00408Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle ArthroplastyJohn R. Steele MDDaniel J. Cunningham MDJames K. DeOrio MDJames A. Nunley MDMark E. Easley MDSamuel B. Adams MDCategory: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The literature for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) demonstrates significant improvements in patient- reported outcomes. While these reports focus on the overall study population, it is clear that some patients do not have a successful outcome. In regards to total hip and knee arthroplasty there is literature helping to define responders, or those who achieve a clinical improvement above the level of a minimally clinically important difference. However, characteristics of responders versus non-responders to TAA have not been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine patient comorbidities and characteristics that help distinguish responders from non-responders after TAA. Methods: Patients undergoing TAA between 1/2007 and 12/2016 were enrolled into a prospective study at a single academic center. Patients completed multiple patient reported outcome measures before surgery and in follow-up including the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Patients were characterized as responders if their 2-year follow-up SMFA function score increased by 50% or more compared to preoperatively and were characterized as non-responders if their SMFA score increased by less than 50% at 2-year follow-up, consistent with OMERACT–OARSI responder criteria. Patient and operative factors along with prevalent pre-operative comorbidities were then associated with responder or non-responder status. Comorbidities that met a significance threshold of p<0.05 in adjusted analyses were incorporated into multivariable outcome models. Results: A total of 492 patients with complete data and 2-year follow-up were included in this study. Based on the SMFA function score improvement cutoff of at least 50% at 2-year follow-up, 332 patients were defined as responders and 160 were defined as non-responders. There was no significant difference between pre-operative SMFA function scores between the groups. Responders had significantly higher preoperative SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores (p<0.001) and significantly lower rates of rheumatoid arthritis (p<0.001), obesity (p=0.05) and depression (p=0.026) as compared to non-responders. In multivariate analysis, preoperative SF-36 MCS score was found to be significantly associated with responder status (p=0.0056). Conclusion: Patients defined as responders after TAA based on 50% or greater improvement in SMFA function scores at 2-year follow-up had significantly higher pre-operative SF-36 MCS scores and significantly lower rates of rheumatoid arthritis, obesity and depression compared to non-responders. Pre-operative SF-36 MCS score was found to be significantly associated with responder status in multivariate analysis. This suggests that patients with depressive symptoms, but not necessarily a diagnosis of depression may not achieve as favorable results after TAA and should be counseled appropriately.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00408
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John R. Steele MD
Daniel J. Cunningham MD
James K. DeOrio MD
James A. Nunley MD
Mark E. Easley MD
Samuel B. Adams MD
spellingShingle John R. Steele MD
Daniel J. Cunningham MD
James K. DeOrio MD
James A. Nunley MD
Mark E. Easley MD
Samuel B. Adams MD
Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet John R. Steele MD
Daniel J. Cunningham MD
James K. DeOrio MD
James A. Nunley MD
Mark E. Easley MD
Samuel B. Adams MD
author_sort John R. Steele MD
title Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
title_short Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
title_full Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Defining Responders vs Non-Responders After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
title_sort defining responders vs non-responders after total ankle arthroplasty
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The literature for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) demonstrates significant improvements in patient- reported outcomes. While these reports focus on the overall study population, it is clear that some patients do not have a successful outcome. In regards to total hip and knee arthroplasty there is literature helping to define responders, or those who achieve a clinical improvement above the level of a minimally clinically important difference. However, characteristics of responders versus non-responders to TAA have not been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine patient comorbidities and characteristics that help distinguish responders from non-responders after TAA. Methods: Patients undergoing TAA between 1/2007 and 12/2016 were enrolled into a prospective study at a single academic center. Patients completed multiple patient reported outcome measures before surgery and in follow-up including the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Patients were characterized as responders if their 2-year follow-up SMFA function score increased by 50% or more compared to preoperatively and were characterized as non-responders if their SMFA score increased by less than 50% at 2-year follow-up, consistent with OMERACT–OARSI responder criteria. Patient and operative factors along with prevalent pre-operative comorbidities were then associated with responder or non-responder status. Comorbidities that met a significance threshold of p<0.05 in adjusted analyses were incorporated into multivariable outcome models. Results: A total of 492 patients with complete data and 2-year follow-up were included in this study. Based on the SMFA function score improvement cutoff of at least 50% at 2-year follow-up, 332 patients were defined as responders and 160 were defined as non-responders. There was no significant difference between pre-operative SMFA function scores between the groups. Responders had significantly higher preoperative SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores (p<0.001) and significantly lower rates of rheumatoid arthritis (p<0.001), obesity (p=0.05) and depression (p=0.026) as compared to non-responders. In multivariate analysis, preoperative SF-36 MCS score was found to be significantly associated with responder status (p=0.0056). Conclusion: Patients defined as responders after TAA based on 50% or greater improvement in SMFA function scores at 2-year follow-up had significantly higher pre-operative SF-36 MCS scores and significantly lower rates of rheumatoid arthritis, obesity and depression compared to non-responders. Pre-operative SF-36 MCS score was found to be significantly associated with responder status in multivariate analysis. This suggests that patients with depressive symptoms, but not necessarily a diagnosis of depression may not achieve as favorable results after TAA and should be counseled appropriately.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00408
work_keys_str_mv AT johnrsteelemd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
AT danieljcunninghammd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
AT jameskdeoriomd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
AT jamesanunleymd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
AT markeeasleymd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
AT samuelbadamsmd definingrespondersvsnonrespondersaftertotalanklearthroplasty
_version_ 1724653536402210816