Grenzen vor Ort

The changing perception and reality of the boundaries of rule in Western Europe are outlined on the basis of current scholarly research and discourse. State control over the drawing of boundaries implied changes that had a substantial impact on the powers of local entities. Instead of an interactive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Windler
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2002-01-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg01_recherche_windler.pdf
id doaj-c38819b5064741b8830211806fc5a473
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c38819b5064741b8830211806fc5a4732021-03-02T03:10:03ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172002-01-01Rg 0112214510.12946/rg01/122-14511Grenzen vor OrtChristian WindlerThe changing perception and reality of the boundaries of rule in Western Europe are outlined on the basis of current scholarly research and discourse. State control over the drawing of boundaries implied changes that had a substantial impact on the powers of local entities. Instead of an interactive local demarcation of boundaries, they came to be determined as an act of sovereignty by neighbouring states. Yet the populations living near the borders made their mark, appropriating them creatively according to their own perception and reality of state and nation. The tendency to regard the drawing of boundaries as an exclusive attribute of state sovereignty had an enormous effect on relations with non-European societies. Yet even in colonial contexts non-Europeans were not helpless in their dealings with European officials and authorities. The Moslem subjects of France in eastern Algeria, for instance, instrumentalised colonial surveys as a tool to be used against their Tunisian neighbours. In many places along the colonial borders of West Africa, closely linked markets were formed. The boundaries drew the population into cross-border trading networks that exploited the discrepancies in fiscal burdens. Border regions formed their own “third spaces” to whose specific requirements European officials and authorities had to adapt.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg01_recherche_windler.pdfMPIeR
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Windler
spellingShingle Christian Windler
Grenzen vor Ort
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
MPIeR
author_facet Christian Windler
author_sort Christian Windler
title Grenzen vor Ort
title_short Grenzen vor Ort
title_full Grenzen vor Ort
title_fullStr Grenzen vor Ort
title_full_unstemmed Grenzen vor Ort
title_sort grenzen vor ort
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
publishDate 2002-01-01
description The changing perception and reality of the boundaries of rule in Western Europe are outlined on the basis of current scholarly research and discourse. State control over the drawing of boundaries implied changes that had a substantial impact on the powers of local entities. Instead of an interactive local demarcation of boundaries, they came to be determined as an act of sovereignty by neighbouring states. Yet the populations living near the borders made their mark, appropriating them creatively according to their own perception and reality of state and nation. The tendency to regard the drawing of boundaries as an exclusive attribute of state sovereignty had an enormous effect on relations with non-European societies. Yet even in colonial contexts non-Europeans were not helpless in their dealings with European officials and authorities. The Moslem subjects of France in eastern Algeria, for instance, instrumentalised colonial surveys as a tool to be used against their Tunisian neighbours. In many places along the colonial borders of West Africa, closely linked markets were formed. The boundaries drew the population into cross-border trading networks that exploited the discrepancies in fiscal burdens. Border regions formed their own “third spaces” to whose specific requirements European officials and authorities had to adapt.
topic MPIeR
url http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg01_recherche_windler.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christianwindler grenzenvorort
_version_ 1724243898756235264