Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics

This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Archakova T.O.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2018-01-01
Series:Психологическая наука и образование
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtml
id doaj-c3678268542b4037a19bbcd9ad159944
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3678268542b4037a19bbcd9ad1599442020-11-25T03:35:17ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихологическая наука и образование1814-20522311-72732018-01-01226687610.17759/pse.2017220606Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age DynamicsArchakova T.O.,0charity foundation "Volunteers to help orphans", Moscow, Russia,This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimensional multiple-item scales as well as single item scales. The examples of techniques for establishing validity of developing instruments are provided. The experience of adaptation of psychometric instruments for measuring well-being to use them in younger samples is discussed. The article also highlights the discrepancies between parents’ and children’s own evaluations of children’s well-being that are documented with the use of several instruments. The second part of the review deals with the issues of subjective well-being dynamics that should be captured by psychometric instruments. The hypotheses of stability of subjective well-being levels (the notions of “homeostatically protected mood” and “well-being set point”) are discussed and contrasted to the results of empirical research of changes in normative levels of subjective well-being from preschool age to adolescence.http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtmlsubjective well-beingquality of lifestages of childhoodconsistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-beingstages of childhood
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Archakova T.O.,
spellingShingle Archakova T.O.,
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
Психологическая наука и образование
subjective well-being
quality of life
stages of childhood
consistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-being
stages of childhood
author_facet Archakova T.O.,
author_sort Archakova T.O.,
title Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
title_short Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
title_full Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
title_fullStr Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
title_sort subjective well-being in children: measurement tools and age dynamics
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
series Психологическая наука и образование
issn 1814-2052
2311-7273
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimensional multiple-item scales as well as single item scales. The examples of techniques for establishing validity of developing instruments are provided. The experience of adaptation of psychometric instruments for measuring well-being to use them in younger samples is discussed. The article also highlights the discrepancies between parents’ and children’s own evaluations of children’s well-being that are documented with the use of several instruments. The second part of the review deals with the issues of subjective well-being dynamics that should be captured by psychometric instruments. The hypotheses of stability of subjective well-being levels (the notions of “homeostatically protected mood” and “well-being set point”) are discussed and contrasted to the results of empirical research of changes in normative levels of subjective well-being from preschool age to adolescence.
topic subjective well-being
quality of life
stages of childhood
consistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-being
stages of childhood
url http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT archakovato subjectivewellbeinginchildrenmeasurementtoolsandagedynamics
_version_ 1724555236860755968