Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics
This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Психологическая наука и образование |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtml |
id |
doaj-c3678268542b4037a19bbcd9ad159944 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c3678268542b4037a19bbcd9ad1599442020-11-25T03:35:17ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихологическая наука и образование1814-20522311-72732018-01-01226687610.17759/pse.2017220606Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age DynamicsArchakova T.O.,0charity foundation "Volunteers to help orphans", Moscow, Russia,This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimensional multiple-item scales as well as single item scales. The examples of techniques for establishing validity of developing instruments are provided. The experience of adaptation of psychometric instruments for measuring well-being to use them in younger samples is discussed. The article also highlights the discrepancies between parents’ and children’s own evaluations of children’s well-being that are documented with the use of several instruments. The second part of the review deals with the issues of subjective well-being dynamics that should be captured by psychometric instruments. The hypotheses of stability of subjective well-being levels (the notions of “homeostatically protected mood” and “well-being set point”) are discussed and contrasted to the results of empirical research of changes in normative levels of subjective well-being from preschool age to adolescence.http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtmlsubjective well-beingquality of lifestages of childhoodconsistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-beingstages of childhood |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Archakova T.O., |
spellingShingle |
Archakova T.O., Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics Психологическая наука и образование subjective well-being quality of life stages of childhood consistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-being stages of childhood |
author_facet |
Archakova T.O., |
author_sort |
Archakova T.O., |
title |
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics |
title_short |
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics |
title_full |
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics |
title_fullStr |
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Subjective Well-being in Children: Measurement Tools and Age Dynamics |
title_sort |
subjective well-being in children: measurement tools and age dynamics |
publisher |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education |
series |
Психологическая наука и образование |
issn |
1814-2052 2311-7273 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This review article deals with the methods for measurement of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. The first part of the review presents an outlook of several psychometric instruments that demonstrate various approaches to measuring subjective well-being: multidimensional and one-dimensional multiple-item scales as well as single item scales. The examples of techniques for establishing validity of developing instruments are provided. The experience of adaptation of psychometric instruments for measuring well-being to use them in younger samples is discussed. The article also highlights the discrepancies between parents’ and children’s own evaluations of children’s well-being that are documented with the use of several instruments. The second part of the review deals with the issues of subjective well-being dynamics that should be captured by psychometric instruments. The hypotheses of stability of subjective well-being levels (the notions of “homeostatically protected mood” and “well-being set point”) are discussed and contrasted to the results of empirical research of changes in normative levels of subjective well-being from preschool age to adolescence. |
topic |
subjective well-being quality of life stages of childhood consistency of parents’ and children’s evaluations subjective well-being stages of childhood |
url |
http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu/2017/n6/Archakova_Veraksa_Zotova_et_al.shtml |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT archakovato subjectivewellbeinginchildrenmeasurementtoolsandagedynamics |
_version_ |
1724555236860755968 |