Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels
The issue of fairness in machine learning models has recently attracted a lot of attention as ensuring it will ensure continued confidence of the general public in the deployment of machine learning systems. We focus on mitigating the harm incurred by a biased machine learning system that offers bet...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00033/full |
id |
doaj-c35a55be05b3438694dabb0484ef8902 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c35a55be05b3438694dabb0484ef89022020-11-25T02:10:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence2624-82122020-05-01310.3389/frai.2020.00033536141Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target LabelsThomas Kehrenberg0Zexun Chen1Novi Quadrianto2Novi Quadrianto3Predictive Analytics Lab (PAL), Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United KingdomPredictive Analytics Lab (PAL), Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United KingdomPredictive Analytics Lab (PAL), Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United KingdomNational Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RussiaThe issue of fairness in machine learning models has recently attracted a lot of attention as ensuring it will ensure continued confidence of the general public in the deployment of machine learning systems. We focus on mitigating the harm incurred by a biased machine learning system that offers better outputs (e.g., loans, job interviews) for certain groups than for others. We show that bias in the output can naturally be controlled in probabilistic models by introducing a latent target output. This formulation has several advantages: first, it is a unified framework for several notions of group fairness such as Demographic Parity and Equality of Opportunity; second, it is expressed as a marginalization instead of a constrained problem; and third, it allows the encoding of our knowledge of what unbiased outputs should be. Practically, the second allows us to avoid unstable constrained optimization procedures and to reuse off-the-shelf toolboxes. The latter translates to the ability to control the level of fairness by directly varying fairness target rates. In contrast, existing approaches rely on intermediate, arguably unintuitive, control parameters such as covariance thresholds.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00033/fullalgorithmic biasfairnessmachine learningdemographic parityequality of opportunity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Kehrenberg Zexun Chen Novi Quadrianto Novi Quadrianto |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Kehrenberg Zexun Chen Novi Quadrianto Novi Quadrianto Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence algorithmic bias fairness machine learning demographic parity equality of opportunity |
author_facet |
Thomas Kehrenberg Zexun Chen Novi Quadrianto Novi Quadrianto |
author_sort |
Thomas Kehrenberg |
title |
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels |
title_short |
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels |
title_full |
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels |
title_fullStr |
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels |
title_sort |
tuning fairness by balancing target labels |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence |
issn |
2624-8212 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
The issue of fairness in machine learning models has recently attracted a lot of attention as ensuring it will ensure continued confidence of the general public in the deployment of machine learning systems. We focus on mitigating the harm incurred by a biased machine learning system that offers better outputs (e.g., loans, job interviews) for certain groups than for others. We show that bias in the output can naturally be controlled in probabilistic models by introducing a latent target output. This formulation has several advantages: first, it is a unified framework for several notions of group fairness such as Demographic Parity and Equality of Opportunity; second, it is expressed as a marginalization instead of a constrained problem; and third, it allows the encoding of our knowledge of what unbiased outputs should be. Practically, the second allows us to avoid unstable constrained optimization procedures and to reuse off-the-shelf toolboxes. The latter translates to the ability to control the level of fairness by directly varying fairness target rates. In contrast, existing approaches rely on intermediate, arguably unintuitive, control parameters such as covariance thresholds. |
topic |
algorithmic bias fairness machine learning demographic parity equality of opportunity |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00033/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomaskehrenberg tuningfairnessbybalancingtargetlabels AT zexunchen tuningfairnessbybalancingtargetlabels AT noviquadrianto tuningfairnessbybalancingtargetlabels AT noviquadrianto tuningfairnessbybalancingtargetlabels |
_version_ |
1724920028357197824 |