Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet

Internet is a well, organized technological achievement of human being and a rapidly improving medium through time. All the novel technological achievements like web 2.0 or web 3.0 are new epochs of Internet technology and Internet is spreading in multiple dimensions, reforming the paradigm, and inn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Lütfi Arslan, Sadi Evren Seker, Cevdet Kızıl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2014-03-01
Series:Emerging Markets Journal
Online Access:http://emaj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/emaj/article/view/54
id doaj-c341f9ed2295497992c0b934b59e6693
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c341f9ed2295497992c0b934b59e66932020-11-25T00:24:52ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghEmerging Markets Journal2159-242X2158-87082014-03-0133879710.5195/emaj.2014.5443Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of InternetMehmet Lütfi Arslan0Sadi Evren Seker1Cevdet Kızıl2Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityYalova UniversityInternet is a well, organized technological achievement of human being and a rapidly improving medium through time. All the novel technological achievements like web 2.0 or web 3.0 are new epochs of Internet technology and Internet is spreading in multiple dimensions, reforming the paradigm, and innovating the technology in a self-renewing fashion. In this paper, the technological construction of Internet and the social paradigms are discussed from two contrary perspectives. Either as “problem solvers” or“technical experts”, the characteristics of incumbents of technological positions seems very problematic in terms of their roles in shaping technology. Are they so disinterested and unbiased on creation of technology? Can we reduce their roles as such? How can we make sure that they are neutral? If we put their roles that way, what about freedom of individual decision-making?http://emaj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/emaj/article/view/54
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehmet Lütfi Arslan
Sadi Evren Seker
Cevdet Kızıl
spellingShingle Mehmet Lütfi Arslan
Sadi Evren Seker
Cevdet Kızıl
Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
Emerging Markets Journal
author_facet Mehmet Lütfi Arslan
Sadi Evren Seker
Cevdet Kızıl
author_sort Mehmet Lütfi Arslan
title Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
title_short Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
title_full Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
title_fullStr Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
title_full_unstemmed Innovation Driven Emerging Technology from two Contrary Perspectives: A Case Study of Internet
title_sort innovation driven emerging technology from two contrary perspectives: a case study of internet
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Emerging Markets Journal
issn 2159-242X
2158-8708
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Internet is a well, organized technological achievement of human being and a rapidly improving medium through time. All the novel technological achievements like web 2.0 or web 3.0 are new epochs of Internet technology and Internet is spreading in multiple dimensions, reforming the paradigm, and innovating the technology in a self-renewing fashion. In this paper, the technological construction of Internet and the social paradigms are discussed from two contrary perspectives. Either as “problem solvers” or“technical experts”, the characteristics of incumbents of technological positions seems very problematic in terms of their roles in shaping technology. Are they so disinterested and unbiased on creation of technology? Can we reduce their roles as such? How can we make sure that they are neutral? If we put their roles that way, what about freedom of individual decision-making?
url http://emaj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/emaj/article/view/54
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetlutfiarslan innovationdrivenemergingtechnologyfromtwocontraryperspectivesacasestudyofinternet
AT sadievrenseker innovationdrivenemergingtechnologyfromtwocontraryperspectivesacasestudyofinternet
AT cevdetkızıl innovationdrivenemergingtechnologyfromtwocontraryperspectivesacasestudyofinternet
_version_ 1725351074424946688