Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data

Objectives. This retrospective clinical and radiographical study evaluated the 10-year outcome of one-visit endodontic treatment with gutta-percha and a methacrylate resin-based sealer. Methods. From an initial sample size of 180 patients, 89 patients with 175 root canals responded to a recall. Trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osvaldo Zmener, Cornelis H. Pameijer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/763248
id doaj-c331ae46b78242c7b9e438d176d4ecd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c331ae46b78242c7b9e438d176d4ecd22020-11-24T23:02:07ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/763248763248Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall DataOsvaldo Zmener0Cornelis H. Pameijer1Postgraduate Program for Specialized Endodontics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Odontology, University of El Salvador/Argentina, Dental Association, C1113AAC Buenos Aires, ArgentinaUniversity of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, USAObjectives. This retrospective clinical and radiographical study evaluated the 10-year outcome of one-visit endodontic treatment with gutta-percha and a methacrylate resin-based sealer. Methods. From an initial sample size of 180 patients, 89 patients with 175 root canals responded to a recall. Treatment outcome was based on predetermined clinical and radiographic criteria. Results. Root canals had been adequately filled to the working length in 80 teeth (89.88%), short in 6 instances (6.74%), while 3 (3.37%) with extrusion immediate postoperatively, showed no sealer in periradicular tissues. The difference in the outcomes of treatments with respect to age, gender, preoperative pulp or periapical status, the size of periapical lesions and the type of permanent restorations were not statistically significantly different (𝑃>0.05). Overall, 7 (7.86%) cases were considered clinically and radiographically a failure. A life table analysis showed a cumulative probability of success of 92.13% after 10 years with a 95% confidence interval of 83.0 to 94.0. Conclusions. The results of this retrospective clinical and radiographical study suggest that the tested methacrylate-resin based sealer used with gutta-percha performed similarly to other root canal sealers over a period 10 years. Clinical Implications. Considering the success rate after 10 years of this methacrylate resin-based sealer can be recommended as an alternative to other commonly used root canal sealers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/763248
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Osvaldo Zmener
Cornelis H. Pameijer
spellingShingle Osvaldo Zmener
Cornelis H. Pameijer
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Osvaldo Zmener
Cornelis H. Pameijer
author_sort Osvaldo Zmener
title Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
title_short Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
title_full Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer: 10-Year Recall Data
title_sort clinical and radiographic evaluation of a resin-based root canal sealer: 10-year recall data
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objectives. This retrospective clinical and radiographical study evaluated the 10-year outcome of one-visit endodontic treatment with gutta-percha and a methacrylate resin-based sealer. Methods. From an initial sample size of 180 patients, 89 patients with 175 root canals responded to a recall. Treatment outcome was based on predetermined clinical and radiographic criteria. Results. Root canals had been adequately filled to the working length in 80 teeth (89.88%), short in 6 instances (6.74%), while 3 (3.37%) with extrusion immediate postoperatively, showed no sealer in periradicular tissues. The difference in the outcomes of treatments with respect to age, gender, preoperative pulp or periapical status, the size of periapical lesions and the type of permanent restorations were not statistically significantly different (𝑃>0.05). Overall, 7 (7.86%) cases were considered clinically and radiographically a failure. A life table analysis showed a cumulative probability of success of 92.13% after 10 years with a 95% confidence interval of 83.0 to 94.0. Conclusions. The results of this retrospective clinical and radiographical study suggest that the tested methacrylate-resin based sealer used with gutta-percha performed similarly to other root canal sealers over a period 10 years. Clinical Implications. Considering the success rate after 10 years of this methacrylate resin-based sealer can be recommended as an alternative to other commonly used root canal sealers.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/763248
work_keys_str_mv AT osvaldozmener clinicalandradiographicevaluationofaresinbasedrootcanalsealer10yearrecalldata
AT cornelishpameijer clinicalandradiographicevaluationofaresinbasedrootcanalsealer10yearrecalldata
_version_ 1725637301444280320