Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma

<p>The monitoring of treatment efficacy in patients with diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is generally performed by common computed tomography (CT). However, CT cannot distinguish between a real and residual tissue mass and in addition cannot be very useful in assessment of early response...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. N. Likar, M. M. Dubrovin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2014-07-01
Series:Onkogematologiâ
Subjects:
PET
Online Access:http://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/index.php/ongm/article/view/51
id doaj-c326c908ea4441a788bf8390f6e5708a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c326c908ea4441a788bf8390f6e5708a2020-11-24T22:53:40ZrusABV-pressOnkogematologiâ1818-83462014-07-0173303766Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphomaYu. N. Likar0M. M. Dubrovin1Dmitry Rogachev Federal Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Ministry of Health of Russia Memorial Sloan‑Kettering Cancer CenterDmitry Rogachev Federal Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Ministry of Health of Russia Memorial Sloan‑Kettering Cancer Center<p>The monitoring of treatment efficacy in patients with diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is generally performed by common computed tomography (CT). However, CT cannot distinguish between a real and residual tissue mass and in addition cannot be very useful in assessment of early response. 18F‑FDG Positron‑emission tomography (PET) has high prognostic implications at treatment completion but is limited as an early predictor. We present the results of a retrospective study where we have evaluated predictive value of initial and interim‑PET<br />(I‑PET) with 18F‑FLT on clinical outcome.</p><p><br /><strong>Methods</strong>. 39 patients were evaluated retrospectively with 18F‑FLT PET before treatment and interim 18F‑FLT PET after 1 cycles of chemotherapy. PET was performed 40−60 minutes after injection of 270−340 MBq of 18F‑FLT. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax ) were calculated on a lesion. Response was assessed according to protocol during and in the end of therapy.</p><p><br /><strong>Results.</strong> All lymphoma lesions identified by a reference method (18F‑FDG PET/CT or CT) showed increased focal tracer uptake of 18F‑FLT. Initial mean SUVmax was significantly higher in patients who showed progressive disease and partial response (SUVmax = 9.5 ± 3.2) than in<br />patients who achieved complete response (SUVmax = 6.3 ± 1.6) (p = 0.018). PFS for positive and negative patients after interim 18F‑FLT PET was 85.1 % and 35.7 %, respectively (р &lt; 0.05).</p><p><br /><strong>Conclusion.</strong> High initial 18F‑FLT uptake is a negative treatment response predictor in patients with DLBCL. Positive I‑PET with 18F‑FLT is a negative PFS predictor compare to patients with negative I‑PET.</p>http://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/index.php/ongm/article/view/51PET18F‑FDG18F‑FLTdiffuse large B‑cell lymphoma
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu. N. Likar
M. M. Dubrovin
spellingShingle Yu. N. Likar
M. M. Dubrovin
Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
Onkogematologiâ
PET
18F‑FDG
18F‑FLT
diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma
author_facet Yu. N. Likar
M. M. Dubrovin
author_sort Yu. N. Likar
title Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
title_short Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
title_full Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
title_fullStr Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18F‑FLT in patients with non‑Hodgkin lymphoma
title_sort predictive value of initial involvement and early response assessment using positron‑emission tomography with 18f‑flt in patients with non‑hodgkin lymphoma
publisher ABV-press
series Onkogematologiâ
issn 1818-8346
publishDate 2014-07-01
description <p>The monitoring of treatment efficacy in patients with diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is generally performed by common computed tomography (CT). However, CT cannot distinguish between a real and residual tissue mass and in addition cannot be very useful in assessment of early response. 18F‑FDG Positron‑emission tomography (PET) has high prognostic implications at treatment completion but is limited as an early predictor. We present the results of a retrospective study where we have evaluated predictive value of initial and interim‑PET<br />(I‑PET) with 18F‑FLT on clinical outcome.</p><p><br /><strong>Methods</strong>. 39 patients were evaluated retrospectively with 18F‑FLT PET before treatment and interim 18F‑FLT PET after 1 cycles of chemotherapy. PET was performed 40−60 minutes after injection of 270−340 MBq of 18F‑FLT. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax ) were calculated on a lesion. Response was assessed according to protocol during and in the end of therapy.</p><p><br /><strong>Results.</strong> All lymphoma lesions identified by a reference method (18F‑FDG PET/CT or CT) showed increased focal tracer uptake of 18F‑FLT. Initial mean SUVmax was significantly higher in patients who showed progressive disease and partial response (SUVmax = 9.5 ± 3.2) than in<br />patients who achieved complete response (SUVmax = 6.3 ± 1.6) (p = 0.018). PFS for positive and negative patients after interim 18F‑FLT PET was 85.1 % and 35.7 %, respectively (р &lt; 0.05).</p><p><br /><strong>Conclusion.</strong> High initial 18F‑FLT uptake is a negative treatment response predictor in patients with DLBCL. Positive I‑PET with 18F‑FLT is a negative PFS predictor compare to patients with negative I‑PET.</p>
topic PET
18F‑FDG
18F‑FLT
diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma
url http://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/index.php/ongm/article/view/51
work_keys_str_mv AT yunlikar predictivevalueofinitialinvolvementandearlyresponseassessmentusingpositronemissiontomographywith18ffltinpatientswithnonhodgkinlymphoma
AT mmdubrovin predictivevalueofinitialinvolvementandearlyresponseassessmentusingpositronemissiontomographywith18ffltinpatientswithnonhodgkinlymphoma
_version_ 1725662480370237440