Avoiding the pestilence of the state: some thoughts on niche construction, heritage, and sacred waterworks
The egalitarian character of traditional irrigation ('subak') systems in Bali has been widely documented and discussed by anthropologists, historians, and archaeologists. In a recent study, Stephen Lansing and Karyn Fox have considered how the principles of niche construction theory might...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
UCL Press
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Archaeology International |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ai-journal.com/articles/364 |
| Summary: | The egalitarian character of traditional irrigation ('subak') systems in Bali has been widely documented and discussed by anthropologists, historians, and archaeologists. In a recent study, Stephen Lansing and Karyn Fox have considered how the principles of niche construction theory might help to understand the genesis of these systems, as well as certain of their institutional characteristics. Here I discuss how this approach might be extended, to include the relationship between 'subak' systems and the hierarchical organization of the Balinese state, within which they exist. Just as the logistics of 'subak' irrigation work to maintain a symbiosis between rice farmers and the non-human parasites (e.g. crop-pests) who surround them, so the ritual elaboration of the agrarian calendar works as a kind of cultural camouflage against the parasitical interests of the state. While in theory, these ecological and institutional dimensions of 'subak' may seem to pertain to quite separate spheres of Balinese life, in practice they are intertwined aspects of a single system, which has allowed the 'subak' to survive from their origins in the 11th century AD, down to their recent inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1463-1725 2048-4194 |