Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice

Theorisations of global governance invariably conceive of it as bringing order to disorder, whether by increasing the ‘density’ of interstate society, or by expressing the leverage of global civil society. This paper seeks to invert the frame, and to take seriously the active disordering of governan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Goodman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2011-12-01
Series:PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/1756
id doaj-c31249f007fb4afb962cd9a3c3c08904
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c31249f007fb4afb962cd9a3c3c089042020-11-24T20:57:11ZengUTS ePRESSPORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies1449-24902011-12-0183Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate JusticeJames GoodmanTheorisations of global governance invariably conceive of it as bringing order to disorder, whether by increasing the ‘density’ of interstate society, or by expressing the leverage of global civil society. This paper seeks to invert the frame, and to take seriously the active disordering of governance, as a generative challenge, that creates new justice claims, and opens-up new fields of public deliberation. Global climate governance is a particularly powerful context in which to track these dynamics. Climate change imposes its own pace of policy reform, forcing new imperatives; it also imposes its own remarkable scope, in terms of global reach and all-encompassing depth. The paper seeks-out generative disjunctures, where existing justice principles that underpin climate governance are challenged, disestablished, and reordered. The paper explores these themes as a way of mapping contending and conflicting trajectories in the development of climate justice as a principle of governance. The disordering effects of climate governance, the social and political forces that arise out of them and their roles in producing contender principles and practices are highlighted. We may then arrive at a conceptualization of climate governance as a necessarily disorderly process, which addresses cumulative and unanticipated challenges of climate change through successive reorientations in its modus operandi. As such, climate governance may be enabled to proceed through and beyond immediate accommodations, to offer new possibilities grounded in new rules of the game that widen realms of engagement and more effectively apprehend the challenges posed.http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/1756Climate Change, Global Climate Governance, Social Movements, Reflexivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Goodman
spellingShingle James Goodman
Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies
Climate Change, Global Climate Governance, Social Movements, Reflexivity
author_facet James Goodman
author_sort James Goodman
title Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
title_short Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
title_full Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
title_fullStr Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
title_full_unstemmed Disorderly Deliberation? Generative Dynamics of Global Climate Justice
title_sort disorderly deliberation? generative dynamics of global climate justice
publisher UTS ePRESS
series PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies
issn 1449-2490
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Theorisations of global governance invariably conceive of it as bringing order to disorder, whether by increasing the ‘density’ of interstate society, or by expressing the leverage of global civil society. This paper seeks to invert the frame, and to take seriously the active disordering of governance, as a generative challenge, that creates new justice claims, and opens-up new fields of public deliberation. Global climate governance is a particularly powerful context in which to track these dynamics. Climate change imposes its own pace of policy reform, forcing new imperatives; it also imposes its own remarkable scope, in terms of global reach and all-encompassing depth. The paper seeks-out generative disjunctures, where existing justice principles that underpin climate governance are challenged, disestablished, and reordered. The paper explores these themes as a way of mapping contending and conflicting trajectories in the development of climate justice as a principle of governance. The disordering effects of climate governance, the social and political forces that arise out of them and their roles in producing contender principles and practices are highlighted. We may then arrive at a conceptualization of climate governance as a necessarily disorderly process, which addresses cumulative and unanticipated challenges of climate change through successive reorientations in its modus operandi. As such, climate governance may be enabled to proceed through and beyond immediate accommodations, to offer new possibilities grounded in new rules of the game that widen realms of engagement and more effectively apprehend the challenges posed.
topic Climate Change, Global Climate Governance, Social Movements, Reflexivity
url http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/1756
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesgoodman disorderlydeliberationgenerativedynamicsofglobalclimatejustice
_version_ 1716788594415239168