Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
Abstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveilla...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948 |
id |
doaj-c307b0469a764a6eb8cd13f50c8acbc5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Di M. Jiang Chihiro Suzuki Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia Charles H. Lim Lucy X. Ma Peiran Sun Hao‐Wen Sim Akina Natori Bryan A. Chan Stephanie Moignard Eric X. Chen Geoffrey Liu Carol J. Swallow Gail E. Darling Rebecca Wong Raymond W. Jang Elena Elimova |
spellingShingle |
Di M. Jiang Chihiro Suzuki Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia Charles H. Lim Lucy X. Ma Peiran Sun Hao‐Wen Sim Akina Natori Bryan A. Chan Stephanie Moignard Eric X. Chen Geoffrey Liu Carol J. Swallow Gail E. Darling Rebecca Wong Raymond W. Jang Elena Elimova Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Cancer Medicine gastric cancer recurrence surveillance survival |
author_facet |
Di M. Jiang Chihiro Suzuki Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia Charles H. Lim Lucy X. Ma Peiran Sun Hao‐Wen Sim Akina Natori Bryan A. Chan Stephanie Moignard Eric X. Chen Geoffrey Liu Carol J. Swallow Gail E. Darling Rebecca Wong Raymond W. Jang Elena Elimova |
author_sort |
Di M. Jiang |
title |
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_short |
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full |
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr |
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort |
surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Cancer Medicine |
issn |
2045-7634 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64). Conclusions Among patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. |
topic |
gastric cancer recurrence surveillance survival |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dimjiang surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT chihirosuzuki surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT osvaldoespingarcia surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT charleshlim surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT lucyxma surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT peiransun surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT haowensim surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT akinanatori surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT bryanachan surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT stephaniemoignard surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT ericxchen surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT geoffreyliu surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT caroljswallow surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT gailedarling surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT rebeccawong surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT raymondwjang surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma AT elenaelimova surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma |
_version_ |
1724782088915255296 |
spelling |
doaj-c307b0469a764a6eb8cd13f50c8acbc52020-11-25T02:40:23ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-05-01993023303210.1002/cam4.2948Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinomaDi M. Jiang0Chihiro Suzuki1Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia2Charles H. Lim3Lucy X. Ma4Peiran Sun5Hao‐Wen Sim6Akina Natori7Bryan A. Chan8Stephanie Moignard9Eric X. Chen10Geoffrey Liu11Carol J. Swallow12Gail E. Darling13Rebecca Wong14Raymond W. Jang15Elena Elimova16Department of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Biostatistics Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology Mount Sinai Hospital Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDivision of Thoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Toronto General Hospital University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaRadiation Medicine Program Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Ontario Cancer Institute University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaAbstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64). Conclusions Among patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948gastric cancerrecurrencesurveillancesurvival |