Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveilla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Di M. Jiang, Chihiro Suzuki, Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia, Charles H. Lim, Lucy X. Ma, Peiran Sun, Hao‐Wen Sim, Akina Natori, Bryan A. Chan, Stephanie Moignard, Eric X. Chen, Geoffrey Liu, Carol J. Swallow, Gail E. Darling, Rebecca Wong, Raymond W. Jang, Elena Elimova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-05-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948
id doaj-c307b0469a764a6eb8cd13f50c8acbc5
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Di M. Jiang
Chihiro Suzuki
Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia
Charles H. Lim
Lucy X. Ma
Peiran Sun
Hao‐Wen Sim
Akina Natori
Bryan A. Chan
Stephanie Moignard
Eric X. Chen
Geoffrey Liu
Carol J. Swallow
Gail E. Darling
Rebecca Wong
Raymond W. Jang
Elena Elimova
spellingShingle Di M. Jiang
Chihiro Suzuki
Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia
Charles H. Lim
Lucy X. Ma
Peiran Sun
Hao‐Wen Sim
Akina Natori
Bryan A. Chan
Stephanie Moignard
Eric X. Chen
Geoffrey Liu
Carol J. Swallow
Gail E. Darling
Rebecca Wong
Raymond W. Jang
Elena Elimova
Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
Cancer Medicine
gastric cancer
recurrence
surveillance
survival
author_facet Di M. Jiang
Chihiro Suzuki
Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia
Charles H. Lim
Lucy X. Ma
Peiran Sun
Hao‐Wen Sim
Akina Natori
Bryan A. Chan
Stephanie Moignard
Eric X. Chen
Geoffrey Liu
Carol J. Swallow
Gail E. Darling
Rebecca Wong
Raymond W. Jang
Elena Elimova
author_sort Di M. Jiang
title Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
publisher Wiley
series Cancer Medicine
issn 2045-7634
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64). Conclusions Among patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
topic gastric cancer
recurrence
surveillance
survival
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948
work_keys_str_mv AT dimjiang surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT chihirosuzuki surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT osvaldoespingarcia surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT charleshlim surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT lucyxma surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT peiransun surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT haowensim surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT akinanatori surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT bryanachan surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT stephaniemoignard surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT ericxchen surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT geoffreyliu surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT caroljswallow surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT gailedarling surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT rebeccawong surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT raymondwjang surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT elenaelimova surveillanceandoutcomesaftercurativeresectionforgastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
_version_ 1724782088915255296
spelling doaj-c307b0469a764a6eb8cd13f50c8acbc52020-11-25T02:40:23ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-05-01993023303210.1002/cam4.2948Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinomaDi M. Jiang0Chihiro Suzuki1Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia2Charles H. Lim3Lucy X. Ma4Peiran Sun5Hao‐Wen Sim6Akina Natori7Bryan A. Chan8Stephanie Moignard9Eric X. Chen10Geoffrey Liu11Carol J. Swallow12Gail E. Darling13Rebecca Wong14Raymond W. Jang15Elena Elimova16Department of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Biostatistics Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology Mount Sinai Hospital Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDivision of Thoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Toronto General Hospital University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaRadiation Medicine Program Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Ontario Cancer Institute University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaDepartment of Medical Oncology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaAbstract Background The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance. Methods A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests. Results Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64). Conclusions Among patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2948gastric cancerrecurrencesurveillancesurvival