Notions of Existence in Frege
In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MULPress
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
Online Access: | https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782 |
id |
doaj-c2ed7d24292e47959755e6a10234df53 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c2ed7d24292e47959755e6a10234df532021-09-28T13:00:03ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032021-09-019810.15173/jhap.v9i8.4782Notions of Existence in FregeDolf Rami0Ruhr-Universität Bochum In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation can be justified on the basis of Frege’s writings. Second, I show that the main error of the standard interpretation consists in the assimilation of the contents of the ordinary language expressions “exist” (“existiert”) and “there is” (“es gibt”) according to Frege. Third, I evaluate possible sources for this unfounded assimilation. After that, I outline my alternative interpretation that distinguishes in opposition to other non-standard interpretations between a substantive and a deflationary part of Frege’s complete conception of existence in analogy to Frege’s analysis of truth and negation. Fifthly, I justify my interpretation by the reconstruction of a so far overlooked master argument of Frege against the above-mentioned assimilation. In the last section, I introduce and discuss four objections against my interpretation that came to my attention. https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dolf Rami |
spellingShingle |
Dolf Rami Notions of Existence in Frege Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
author_facet |
Dolf Rami |
author_sort |
Dolf Rami |
title |
Notions of Existence in Frege |
title_short |
Notions of Existence in Frege |
title_full |
Notions of Existence in Frege |
title_fullStr |
Notions of Existence in Frege |
title_full_unstemmed |
Notions of Existence in Frege |
title_sort |
notions of existence in frege |
publisher |
MULPress |
series |
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
issn |
2159-0303 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation can be justified on the basis of Frege’s writings. Second, I show that the main error of the standard interpretation consists in the assimilation of the contents of the ordinary language expressions “exist” (“existiert”) and “there is” (“es gibt”) according to Frege. Third, I evaluate possible sources for this unfounded assimilation. After that, I outline my alternative interpretation that distinguishes in opposition to other non-standard interpretations between a substantive and a deflationary part of Frege’s complete conception of existence in analogy to Frege’s analysis of truth and negation. Fifthly, I justify my interpretation by the reconstruction of a so far overlooked master argument of Frege against the above-mentioned assimilation. In the last section, I introduce and discuss four objections against my interpretation that came to my attention.
|
url |
https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dolframi notionsofexistenceinfrege |
_version_ |
1716866123851366400 |