Notions of Existence in Frege

In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dolf Rami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MULPress 2021-09-01
Series:Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
Online Access:https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782
id doaj-c2ed7d24292e47959755e6a10234df53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2ed7d24292e47959755e6a10234df532021-09-28T13:00:03ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032021-09-019810.15173/jhap.v9i8.4782Notions of Existence in FregeDolf Rami0Ruhr-Universität Bochum In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation can be justified on the basis of Frege’s writings. Second, I show that the main error of the standard interpretation consists in the assimilation of the contents of the ordinary language expressions “exist” (“existiert”) and “there is” (“es gibt”) according to Frege. Third, I evaluate possible sources for this unfounded assimilation. After that, I outline my alternative interpretation that distinguishes in opposition to other non-standard interpretations between a substantive and a deflationary part of Frege’s complete conception of existence in analogy to Frege’s analysis of truth and negation. Fifthly, I justify my interpretation by the reconstruction of a so far overlooked master argument of Frege against the above-mentioned assimilation. In the last section, I introduce and discuss four objections against my interpretation that came to my attention. https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dolf Rami
spellingShingle Dolf Rami
Notions of Existence in Frege
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
author_facet Dolf Rami
author_sort Dolf Rami
title Notions of Existence in Frege
title_short Notions of Existence in Frege
title_full Notions of Existence in Frege
title_fullStr Notions of Existence in Frege
title_full_unstemmed Notions of Existence in Frege
title_sort notions of existence in frege
publisher MULPress
series Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
issn 2159-0303
publishDate 2021-09-01
description In this paper, I aim to present the main components of my non-standard interpretation of Frege’s views on existence to the English-speaking public (Rami 2017a, 2018, 2019a,b). First, I will outline the standard interpretation and show how to a great but not full extent the standard interpretation can be justified on the basis of Frege’s writings. Second, I show that the main error of the standard interpretation consists in the assimilation of the contents of the ordinary language expressions “exist” (“existiert”) and “there is” (“es gibt”) according to Frege. Third, I evaluate possible sources for this unfounded assimilation. After that, I outline my alternative interpretation that distinguishes in opposition to other non-standard interpretations between a substantive and a deflationary part of Frege’s complete conception of existence in analogy to Frege’s analysis of truth and negation. Fifthly, I justify my interpretation by the reconstruction of a so far overlooked master argument of Frege against the above-mentioned assimilation. In the last section, I introduce and discuss four objections against my interpretation that came to my attention.
url https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4782
work_keys_str_mv AT dolframi notionsofexistenceinfrege
_version_ 1716866123851366400