Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior

Abstract Behavioral adaptation, a central feature of voluntary movement, is known to rely on top-down cognitive control. For example, the conflict-adaptation effect on tasks such as the Stroop task leads to better performance (e.g. shorter reaction time) for incongruent trials following an already i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Bosc, G. Bucchioni, B. Ribot, T. Michelet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91663-9
id doaj-c2deb3df39f84cac9a9ca422b715df4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2deb3df39f84cac9a9ca422b715df4c2021-06-13T11:40:11ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-91663-9Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behaviorM. Bosc0G. Bucchioni1B. Ribot2T. Michelet3Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR 5287Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR 5287Abstract Behavioral adaptation, a central feature of voluntary movement, is known to rely on top-down cognitive control. For example, the conflict-adaptation effect on tasks such as the Stroop task leads to better performance (e.g. shorter reaction time) for incongruent trials following an already incongruent one. The role of higher-order cortices in such between-trial adjustments is well documented, however, a specific involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) has seldom been questioned. Here we studied changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the conflict-adaptation process. For this, we used single-pulse transcranial-magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied between two consecutive trials in an interference flanker task, while measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after agonistic and antagonistic voluntary movements. In agonist movement, MEP amplitude was modulated by recent movement history with an increase favoring movement repetition, but no significant change in MEP size was observed whether a previous trial was incongruent or congruent. Critically, for an antagonist movement, the relative size of MEPs following incongruent trials correlated positively with the strength of behavioral adaptation measured as the degree of RT shortening across subjects. This post-conflict increase in corticospinal excitability related to antagonist muscle recruitment could compensate for a potential deleterious bias due to recent movement history that favors the last executed action. Namely, it prepares the motor system to rapidly adapt to a changing and unpredictable context by equalizing the preparation for all possible motor responses.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91663-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Bosc
G. Bucchioni
B. Ribot
T. Michelet
spellingShingle M. Bosc
G. Bucchioni
B. Ribot
T. Michelet
Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
Scientific Reports
author_facet M. Bosc
G. Bucchioni
B. Ribot
T. Michelet
author_sort M. Bosc
title Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
title_short Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
title_full Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
title_fullStr Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
title_full_unstemmed Bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
title_sort bypassing use-dependent plasticity in the primary motor cortex to preserve adaptive behavior
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Behavioral adaptation, a central feature of voluntary movement, is known to rely on top-down cognitive control. For example, the conflict-adaptation effect on tasks such as the Stroop task leads to better performance (e.g. shorter reaction time) for incongruent trials following an already incongruent one. The role of higher-order cortices in such between-trial adjustments is well documented, however, a specific involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) has seldom been questioned. Here we studied changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the conflict-adaptation process. For this, we used single-pulse transcranial-magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied between two consecutive trials in an interference flanker task, while measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after agonistic and antagonistic voluntary movements. In agonist movement, MEP amplitude was modulated by recent movement history with an increase favoring movement repetition, but no significant change in MEP size was observed whether a previous trial was incongruent or congruent. Critically, for an antagonist movement, the relative size of MEPs following incongruent trials correlated positively with the strength of behavioral adaptation measured as the degree of RT shortening across subjects. This post-conflict increase in corticospinal excitability related to antagonist muscle recruitment could compensate for a potential deleterious bias due to recent movement history that favors the last executed action. Namely, it prepares the motor system to rapidly adapt to a changing and unpredictable context by equalizing the preparation for all possible motor responses.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91663-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mbosc bypassingusedependentplasticityintheprimarymotorcortextopreserveadaptivebehavior
AT gbucchioni bypassingusedependentplasticityintheprimarymotorcortextopreserveadaptivebehavior
AT bribot bypassingusedependentplasticityintheprimarymotorcortextopreserveadaptivebehavior
AT tmichelet bypassingusedependentplasticityintheprimarymotorcortextopreserveadaptivebehavior
_version_ 1721379615332630528