QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future

Ability of quantitative structure−property/activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs) to serve for epistemological processes in natural sciences is discussed. Some weirdness of QSPR/QSAR state-of-art is listed. There are some contradictions in the research results in this area. Sometimes, these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/6/1292
id doaj-c2d042564d7244d29744cd2cba683747
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2d042564d7244d29744cd2cba6837472020-11-25T02:10:34ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492020-03-01256129210.3390/molecules25061292molecules25061292QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the FutureAndrey A. Toropov0Alla P. Toropova1Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Department of Environmental Health Science, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milano, ItalyLaboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Department of Environmental Health Science, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156 Milano, ItalyAbility of quantitative structure−property/activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs) to serve for epistemological processes in natural sciences is discussed. Some weirdness of QSPR/QSAR state-of-art is listed. There are some contradictions in the research results in this area. Sometimes, these should be classified as paradoxes or weirdness. These points are often ignored. Here, these are listed and briefly commented. In addition, hypotheses on the future evolution of the QSPR/QSAR theory and practice are suggested. In particular, the possibility of extending of the QSPR/QSAR problematic by searching for the “statistical similarity” of different endpoints is suggested and illustrated by an example for relatively “distanced each from other” endpoints, namely (i) mutagenicity, (ii) anticancer activity, and (iii) blood−brain barrier.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/6/1292qsar evolutionmulti-target qsarmonte carlo methodfuzzy sets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrey A. Toropov
Alla P. Toropova
spellingShingle Andrey A. Toropov
Alla P. Toropova
QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
Molecules
qsar evolution
multi-target qsar
monte carlo method
fuzzy sets
author_facet Andrey A. Toropov
Alla P. Toropova
author_sort Andrey A. Toropov
title QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
title_short QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
title_full QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
title_fullStr QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
title_full_unstemmed QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future
title_sort qspr/qsar: state-of-art, weirdness, the future
publisher MDPI AG
series Molecules
issn 1420-3049
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Ability of quantitative structure−property/activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs) to serve for epistemological processes in natural sciences is discussed. Some weirdness of QSPR/QSAR state-of-art is listed. There are some contradictions in the research results in this area. Sometimes, these should be classified as paradoxes or weirdness. These points are often ignored. Here, these are listed and briefly commented. In addition, hypotheses on the future evolution of the QSPR/QSAR theory and practice are suggested. In particular, the possibility of extending of the QSPR/QSAR problematic by searching for the “statistical similarity” of different endpoints is suggested and illustrated by an example for relatively “distanced each from other” endpoints, namely (i) mutagenicity, (ii) anticancer activity, and (iii) blood−brain barrier.
topic qsar evolution
multi-target qsar
monte carlo method
fuzzy sets
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/6/1292
work_keys_str_mv AT andreyatoropov qsprqsarstateofartweirdnessthefuture
AT allaptoropova qsprqsarstateofartweirdnessthefuture
_version_ 1724918919921139712