Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)

The applicability and analytical power of political ecology is improved by study of the 'ethno-ecological context', which is based on the concept of socio-ecological systems (SES). It represents an operating principle of interactions between the ecological and social systems of a specific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gigi Tevzadze, Zaal Kikvidze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2016-12-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20212
id doaj-c2c40c14549a481299ee04fcb068d744
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2c40c14549a481299ee04fcb068d7442020-11-24T21:25:15ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512016-12-0123124626210.2458/v23i1.2021219680Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)Gigi Tevzadze0Zaal Kikvidze1Ilia State University, TbilisiIlia State UniversityThe applicability and analytical power of political ecology is improved by study of the 'ethno-ecological context', which is based on the concept of socio-ecological systems (SES). It represents an operating principle of interactions between the ecological and social systems of a specific locality, developing under different historical, political and climatic regimes. We compare two socio-ecological systems in the high mountain regions of Georgia – the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti. These are on the southern and northern borders of Georgia. Historically, their socio-ecological systems were similar but today the Skhalta Gorge is rapidly depopulating, whilst in the Upper Svaneti the population is stable. The comparison of the ethno-ecological context and today's state of affairs suggests that (i) "self-regulation" and conserving local culture and traditions, whilst the country undergoes rapid social and political changes, can lead to degradation or even destruction of either the ecological or the social components; (ii) conversely, sustainable development results from active intervention rather than abstaining from it; (iii) tourism appears as a mechanism that restores the ethno-ecological context by providing a source of income - under certain conditions, it supports traditional agriculture. Key words: Political ecology, ethno-ecological context, socio-ecological systems, Georgia, Adjara, Svaneti, Mulakhi community, Skhalta Gorge, sustainability, tourism.https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20212
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gigi Tevzadze
Zaal Kikvidze
spellingShingle Gigi Tevzadze
Zaal Kikvidze
Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Gigi Tevzadze
Zaal Kikvidze
author_sort Gigi Tevzadze
title Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
title_short Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
title_full Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
title_fullStr Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
title_full_unstemmed Ethno-ecological contexts of the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti (Georgia, the Caucasus)
title_sort ethno-ecological contexts of the skhalta gorge and the upper svaneti (georgia, the caucasus)
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The applicability and analytical power of political ecology is improved by study of the 'ethno-ecological context', which is based on the concept of socio-ecological systems (SES). It represents an operating principle of interactions between the ecological and social systems of a specific locality, developing under different historical, political and climatic regimes. We compare two socio-ecological systems in the high mountain regions of Georgia – the Skhalta Gorge and the Upper Svaneti. These are on the southern and northern borders of Georgia. Historically, their socio-ecological systems were similar but today the Skhalta Gorge is rapidly depopulating, whilst in the Upper Svaneti the population is stable. The comparison of the ethno-ecological context and today's state of affairs suggests that (i) "self-regulation" and conserving local culture and traditions, whilst the country undergoes rapid social and political changes, can lead to degradation or even destruction of either the ecological or the social components; (ii) conversely, sustainable development results from active intervention rather than abstaining from it; (iii) tourism appears as a mechanism that restores the ethno-ecological context by providing a source of income - under certain conditions, it supports traditional agriculture. Key words: Political ecology, ethno-ecological context, socio-ecological systems, Georgia, Adjara, Svaneti, Mulakhi community, Skhalta Gorge, sustainability, tourism.
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20212
work_keys_str_mv AT gigitevzadze ethnoecologicalcontextsoftheskhaltagorgeandtheuppersvanetigeorgiathecaucasus
AT zaalkikvidze ethnoecologicalcontextsoftheskhaltagorgeandtheuppersvanetigeorgiathecaucasus
_version_ 1725983923005030400