New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic
Abstract Previous research has noted that many factors greatly influence the spread of COVID‐19. Contrary to explicit factors that are measurable, such as population density, number of medical staff, and the daily test rate, many factors are not directly observable, for instance, culture differences...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2021-09-01
|
Series: | GeoHealth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000450 |
id |
doaj-c299e935fd584039b87c4fdb4119c943 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c299e935fd584039b87c4fdb4119c9432021-09-27T10:42:29ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)GeoHealth2471-14032021-09-0159n/an/a10.1029/2021GH000450New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 PandemicYun Li0Megan Rice1Moming Li2Chengan Du3Xin Xin4Zifu Wang5Xun Shi6Chaowei Yang7Department of Geography and GeoInformation Science George Mason University Fairfax VA USADepartment of Chemistry Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA USADepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA USASchool of Internal Medicine Yale University New Heaven CT USASchool of Internal Medicine Yale University New Heaven CT USADepartment of Geography and GeoInformation Science George Mason University Fairfax VA USADepartment of Geography Dartmouth College Hanover NH USADepartment of Geography and GeoInformation Science George Mason University Fairfax VA USAAbstract Previous research has noted that many factors greatly influence the spread of COVID‐19. Contrary to explicit factors that are measurable, such as population density, number of medical staff, and the daily test rate, many factors are not directly observable, for instance, culture differences and attitudes toward the disease, which may introduce unobserved heterogeneity. Most contemporary COVID‐19 related research has focused on modeling the relationship between explicitly measurable factors and the response variable of interest (such as the infection rate or the death rate). The infection rate is a commonly used metric for evaluating disease progression and a state's mitigation efforts. Because unobservable sources of heterogeneity cannot be measured directly, it is hard to incorporate them into the quantitative assessment and decision‐making process. In this study, we propose new metrics to study a state's performance by adjusting the measurable county‐level covariates and unobservable state‐level heterogeneity through random effects. A hierarchical linear model (HLM) is postulated, and we calculate two model‐based metrics—the standardized infection ratio (SDIR) and the adjusted infection rate (AIR). This analysis highlights certain time periods when the infection rate for a state was high while their SDIR was low and vice versa. We show that trends in these metrics can give insight into certain aspects of a state's performance. As each state continues to develop their individualized COVID‐19 mitigation strategy and ultimately works to improve their performance, the SDIR and AIR may help supplement the crude infection rate metric to provide a more thorough understanding of a state's performance.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000450COVID‐19hierarchical linear modelsinfection rateperformance evaluationrandom effects |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yun Li Megan Rice Moming Li Chengan Du Xin Xin Zifu Wang Xun Shi Chaowei Yang |
spellingShingle |
Yun Li Megan Rice Moming Li Chengan Du Xin Xin Zifu Wang Xun Shi Chaowei Yang New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic GeoHealth COVID‐19 hierarchical linear models infection rate performance evaluation random effects |
author_facet |
Yun Li Megan Rice Moming Li Chengan Du Xin Xin Zifu Wang Xun Shi Chaowei Yang |
author_sort |
Yun Li |
title |
New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
title_short |
New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
title_full |
New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr |
New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
New Metrics for Assessing the State Performance in Combating the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
title_sort |
new metrics for assessing the state performance in combating the covid‐19 pandemic |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
series |
GeoHealth |
issn |
2471-1403 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Previous research has noted that many factors greatly influence the spread of COVID‐19. Contrary to explicit factors that are measurable, such as population density, number of medical staff, and the daily test rate, many factors are not directly observable, for instance, culture differences and attitudes toward the disease, which may introduce unobserved heterogeneity. Most contemporary COVID‐19 related research has focused on modeling the relationship between explicitly measurable factors and the response variable of interest (such as the infection rate or the death rate). The infection rate is a commonly used metric for evaluating disease progression and a state's mitigation efforts. Because unobservable sources of heterogeneity cannot be measured directly, it is hard to incorporate them into the quantitative assessment and decision‐making process. In this study, we propose new metrics to study a state's performance by adjusting the measurable county‐level covariates and unobservable state‐level heterogeneity through random effects. A hierarchical linear model (HLM) is postulated, and we calculate two model‐based metrics—the standardized infection ratio (SDIR) and the adjusted infection rate (AIR). This analysis highlights certain time periods when the infection rate for a state was high while their SDIR was low and vice versa. We show that trends in these metrics can give insight into certain aspects of a state's performance. As each state continues to develop their individualized COVID‐19 mitigation strategy and ultimately works to improve their performance, the SDIR and AIR may help supplement the crude infection rate metric to provide a more thorough understanding of a state's performance. |
topic |
COVID‐19 hierarchical linear models infection rate performance evaluation random effects |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000450 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yunli newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT meganrice newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT momingli newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT chengandu newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT xinxin newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT zifuwang newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT xunshi newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic AT chaoweiyang newmetricsforassessingthestateperformanceincombatingthecovid19pandemic |
_version_ |
1716866888154218497 |