Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images have been used to map flooded areas with great success. Flooded areas are often identified by detecting changes between a pair of images recorded before and after a certain flood. During the 2018 Western Japan Floods, the change detection method generated signif...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2320 |
id |
doaj-c28c57dacf0a45dda489ad522f1eb08a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c28c57dacf0a45dda489ad522f1eb08a2020-11-25T01:27:37ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-10-011119232010.3390/rs11192320rs11192320Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan FloodsLuis Moya0Yukio Endo1Genki Okada2Shunichi Koshimura3Erick Mas4International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Aoba 468-1-E301, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, JapanGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba 468-1-E301, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, JapanGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba 468-1-E301, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, JapanInternational Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Aoba 468-1-E301, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, JapanInternational Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Aoba 468-1-E301, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, JapanSynthetic aperture radar (SAR) images have been used to map flooded areas with great success. Flooded areas are often identified by detecting changes between a pair of images recorded before and after a certain flood. During the 2018 Western Japan Floods, the change detection method generated significant misclassifications for agricultural targets. To evaluate whether such a situation could be repeated in future events, this paper examines and identifies the causes of the misclassifications. We concluded that the errors occurred because of the following. (i) The use of only a single pair of SAR images from before and after the floods. (ii) The unawareness of the dynamics of the backscattering intensity through time in agricultural areas. (iii) The effect of the wavelength on agricultural targets. Furthermore, it is highly probable that such conditions might occur in future events. Our conclusions are supported by a field survey of 35 paddy fields located within the misclassified area and the analysis of Sentinel-1 time series data. In addition, in this paper, we propose a new parameter, which we named “conditional coherence”, that can be of help to overcome the referred issue. The new parameter is based on the physical mechanism of the backscattering on flooded and non-flooded agricultural targets. The performance of the conditional coherence as an input of discriminant functions to identify flooded and non-flooded agricultural targets is reported as well.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2320the 2018 western japan floodsalos-2 sar imageryagriculture targetsfalse detection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luis Moya Yukio Endo Genki Okada Shunichi Koshimura Erick Mas |
spellingShingle |
Luis Moya Yukio Endo Genki Okada Shunichi Koshimura Erick Mas Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods Remote Sensing the 2018 western japan floods alos-2 sar imagery agriculture targets false detection |
author_facet |
Luis Moya Yukio Endo Genki Okada Shunichi Koshimura Erick Mas |
author_sort |
Luis Moya |
title |
Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods |
title_short |
Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods |
title_full |
Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods |
title_fullStr |
Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drawback in the Change Detection Approach: False Detection during the 2018 Western Japan Floods |
title_sort |
drawback in the change detection approach: false detection during the 2018 western japan floods |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images have been used to map flooded areas with great success. Flooded areas are often identified by detecting changes between a pair of images recorded before and after a certain flood. During the 2018 Western Japan Floods, the change detection method generated significant misclassifications for agricultural targets. To evaluate whether such a situation could be repeated in future events, this paper examines and identifies the causes of the misclassifications. We concluded that the errors occurred because of the following. (i) The use of only a single pair of SAR images from before and after the floods. (ii) The unawareness of the dynamics of the backscattering intensity through time in agricultural areas. (iii) The effect of the wavelength on agricultural targets. Furthermore, it is highly probable that such conditions might occur in future events. Our conclusions are supported by a field survey of 35 paddy fields located within the misclassified area and the analysis of Sentinel-1 time series data. In addition, in this paper, we propose a new parameter, which we named “conditional coherence”, that can be of help to overcome the referred issue. The new parameter is based on the physical mechanism of the backscattering on flooded and non-flooded agricultural targets. The performance of the conditional coherence as an input of discriminant functions to identify flooded and non-flooded agricultural targets is reported as well. |
topic |
the 2018 western japan floods alos-2 sar imagery agriculture targets false detection |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2320 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luismoya drawbackinthechangedetectionapproachfalsedetectionduringthe2018westernjapanfloods AT yukioendo drawbackinthechangedetectionapproachfalsedetectionduringthe2018westernjapanfloods AT genkiokada drawbackinthechangedetectionapproachfalsedetectionduringthe2018westernjapanfloods AT shunichikoshimura drawbackinthechangedetectionapproachfalsedetectionduringthe2018westernjapanfloods AT erickmas drawbackinthechangedetectionapproachfalsedetectionduringthe2018westernjapanfloods |
_version_ |
1725104293939249152 |