Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches

Temporal mismatches among plants and pollinators, driven by climate change, are considered a potential cause of population declines of these mutualists. However, field studies demonstrating population declines as a result of climate-driven phenological mismatches are uncommon, and the extent to whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Ryan Straka, Brian M. Starzomski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Enviroquest Ltd. 2014-08-01
Series:Journal of Pollination Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pollinationecology.org/index.php?journal=jpe&page=article&op=view&path[]=221&path[]=88
id doaj-c27b4a2982b84fa7a6fa4670bc7702c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c27b4a2982b84fa7a6fa4670bc7702c82020-11-24T23:36:33ZengEnviroquest Ltd.Journal of Pollination Ecology1920-76031920-76032014-08-0113129145Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatchesJason Ryan StrakaBrian M. StarzomskiTemporal mismatches among plants and pollinators, driven by climate change, are considered a potential cause of population declines of these mutualists. However, field studies demonstrating population declines as a result of climate-driven phenological mismatches are uncommon, and the extent to which mismatches will be a problem in the future remains unclear. We revisit predicted consequences of climate-driven phenological mismatch in plant-pollinator systems by identifying nine previously-applied assumptions that are violated or insufficiently understood in real systems. Briefly, the assumptions are: (1) Dates of first-flowering (DFF) or dates of first activity (DFA) correctly describe phenology, and disparities between DFF and DFA represent the magnitude of mismatch. (2) “Optimal” matches are measured correctly. (3) Advancement of DFF or DFA will be the primary phenological change in the future. (4) Future phenological shifts will be independent for each species. (5) All plant-pollinator interactions are equally effective. (6) Populations of plants and pollinators are limited by mutualistic interactions. Some previous models have also assumed that the effects of future mismatches will not be influenced by (7) emergence of novel interactions, (8) competition or facilitation from altered co-flowering and co-flight, and (9) phenotypic plasticity and rapid adaptive evolution of phenology. Those assumptions affect the direction, extent, and accuracy of predicted consequences of future phenological mismatch. In discussing them, we identify important topics for future research in pollination ecology.http://www.pollinationecology.org/index.php?journal=jpe&page=article&op=view&path[]=221&path[]=88Phenologyplant-pollinator interactionsflowering timemismatchclimate changeevolutionary ecology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jason Ryan Straka
Brian M. Starzomski
spellingShingle Jason Ryan Straka
Brian M. Starzomski
Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Phenology
plant-pollinator interactions
flowering time
mismatch
climate change
evolutionary ecology
author_facet Jason Ryan Straka
Brian M. Starzomski
author_sort Jason Ryan Straka
title Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
title_short Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
title_full Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
title_fullStr Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
title_full_unstemmed Humming along or buzzing off? The elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
title_sort humming along or buzzing off? the elusive consequences of plant-pollinator mismatches
publisher Enviroquest Ltd.
series Journal of Pollination Ecology
issn 1920-7603
1920-7603
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Temporal mismatches among plants and pollinators, driven by climate change, are considered a potential cause of population declines of these mutualists. However, field studies demonstrating population declines as a result of climate-driven phenological mismatches are uncommon, and the extent to which mismatches will be a problem in the future remains unclear. We revisit predicted consequences of climate-driven phenological mismatch in plant-pollinator systems by identifying nine previously-applied assumptions that are violated or insufficiently understood in real systems. Briefly, the assumptions are: (1) Dates of first-flowering (DFF) or dates of first activity (DFA) correctly describe phenology, and disparities between DFF and DFA represent the magnitude of mismatch. (2) “Optimal” matches are measured correctly. (3) Advancement of DFF or DFA will be the primary phenological change in the future. (4) Future phenological shifts will be independent for each species. (5) All plant-pollinator interactions are equally effective. (6) Populations of plants and pollinators are limited by mutualistic interactions. Some previous models have also assumed that the effects of future mismatches will not be influenced by (7) emergence of novel interactions, (8) competition or facilitation from altered co-flowering and co-flight, and (9) phenotypic plasticity and rapid adaptive evolution of phenology. Those assumptions affect the direction, extent, and accuracy of predicted consequences of future phenological mismatch. In discussing them, we identify important topics for future research in pollination ecology.
topic Phenology
plant-pollinator interactions
flowering time
mismatch
climate change
evolutionary ecology
url http://www.pollinationecology.org/index.php?journal=jpe&page=article&op=view&path[]=221&path[]=88
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonryanstraka hummingalongorbuzzingofftheelusiveconsequencesofplantpollinatormismatches
AT brianmstarzomski hummingalongorbuzzingofftheelusiveconsequencesofplantpollinatormismatches
_version_ 1716295440640507904