Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia

The author analyses the current process pertaining to the legal rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović, the leader of the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, by first placing the process in relation to European-wide trends of coming to terms with the past. He then moves to a discussion of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dulić Tomislav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia 2012-01-01
Series:Sociologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2012/0038-03181204625D.pdf
id doaj-c2757f445f264813af04e7e7437b2dc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2757f445f264813af04e7e7437b2dc42020-11-25T02:19:44ZengSociological Scientific Society of SerbiaSociologija0038-03182012-01-0154462564810.2298/SOC1204625DSentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in SerbiaDulić TomislavThe author analyses the current process pertaining to the legal rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović, the leader of the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, by first placing the process in relation to European-wide trends of coming to terms with the past. He then moves to a discussion of the Serbian law on rehabilitation, where he points to a number of contradictions and inconsistencies, particularly with regard to the issue of whether war criminals can be rehabilitated. The author then turns to a historical analysis of Mihailović’s wartime activities, with particular emphasis on the issues of treason and war crimes. It is the author’s main argument that Mihailović became embroiled in various forms of collusion with the enemy, although these varied considerably over time. More importantly, however, Mihailović violated a number of legal principles of international humanitarian law, which means that he would have been sentenced today by any court applying the highest international standards of due process. While this would make him ineligible for rehabilitation according to recent political statements and the law of 2011, complications might arise due to the fact that Mihailović’s case will be heard in accordance with a previous law from 2006.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2012/0038-03181204625D.pdfHistoryhistoriographySecond World Wargenocidewar crimesinternational lawrehabilitationMihailovićYugoslaviaSerbia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dulić Tomislav
spellingShingle Dulić Tomislav
Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
Sociologija
History
historiography
Second World War
genocide
war crimes
international law
rehabilitation
Mihailović
Yugoslavia
Serbia
author_facet Dulić Tomislav
author_sort Dulić Tomislav
title Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
title_short Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
title_full Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
title_fullStr Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Sentenced “For ideological and political reasons”? The rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović in Serbia
title_sort sentenced “for ideological and political reasons”? the rehabilitation of dragoljub “draža” mihailović in serbia
publisher Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia
series Sociologija
issn 0038-0318
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The author analyses the current process pertaining to the legal rehabilitation of Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović, the leader of the Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, by first placing the process in relation to European-wide trends of coming to terms with the past. He then moves to a discussion of the Serbian law on rehabilitation, where he points to a number of contradictions and inconsistencies, particularly with regard to the issue of whether war criminals can be rehabilitated. The author then turns to a historical analysis of Mihailović’s wartime activities, with particular emphasis on the issues of treason and war crimes. It is the author’s main argument that Mihailović became embroiled in various forms of collusion with the enemy, although these varied considerably over time. More importantly, however, Mihailović violated a number of legal principles of international humanitarian law, which means that he would have been sentenced today by any court applying the highest international standards of due process. While this would make him ineligible for rehabilitation according to recent political statements and the law of 2011, complications might arise due to the fact that Mihailović’s case will be heard in accordance with a previous law from 2006.
topic History
historiography
Second World War
genocide
war crimes
international law
rehabilitation
Mihailović
Yugoslavia
Serbia
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2012/0038-03181204625D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dulictomislav sentencedforideologicalandpoliticalreasonstherehabilitationofdragoljubdrazamihailovicinserbia
_version_ 1724874694375505920