M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor

This article presents M. M. Bakhtin as a University professor through his own views of on the nature of university teaching: lecturing, seminars and colloquia, engaging students in debates and reflexive analysis of literary texts, “scientific thinking”, and working with bibliography. As a Chair of R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikolai L Vasiliev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2018-01-01
Series:Dialogic Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/234
id doaj-c26a61ba03be41038532e62a74d14b54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c26a61ba03be41038532e62a74d14b542020-11-25T00:45:39ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghDialogic Pedagogy2325-32902018-01-016010.5195/dpj.2018.23498M. M. Bakhtin as a University ProfessorNikolai L Vasiliev0Mordovia State University, RussiaThis article presents M. M. Bakhtin as a University professor through his own views of on the nature of university teaching: lecturing, seminars and colloquia, engaging students in debates and reflexive analysis of literary texts, “scientific thinking”, and working with bibliography. As a Chair of Russian and Foreign Literature department of the Mordovian National Pedagogical Institute (later the Mordovia State University), for a quarter of a century, Bakhtin was promoting teaching approaches that would support students’ informed, independent, analytical and reflexive learning. According to the minutes from different department meetings at his university, over the years, Bakhtin struggled to define and improve his own guidance and teaching in the Literature studies and the overall work of his department. His three pedagogical goals for a literary lecture were: 1) Communication of certain information on a given topic - establishing the level of students’ familiarity with the topic; 2) Fostering students’ scientific thinking; and 3) Fostering students’ aesthetic perception and taste. Some of his former students emphasized his erudition, pedagogic skill, and ability to stimulate his students’ imagination and reflective thinking.http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/234education, lieterature, instruction, purpose of education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolai L Vasiliev
spellingShingle Nikolai L Vasiliev
M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
Dialogic Pedagogy
education, lieterature, instruction, purpose of education
author_facet Nikolai L Vasiliev
author_sort Nikolai L Vasiliev
title M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
title_short M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
title_full M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
title_fullStr M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
title_full_unstemmed M. M. Bakhtin as a University Professor
title_sort m. m. bakhtin as a university professor
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Dialogic Pedagogy
issn 2325-3290
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This article presents M. M. Bakhtin as a University professor through his own views of on the nature of university teaching: lecturing, seminars and colloquia, engaging students in debates and reflexive analysis of literary texts, “scientific thinking”, and working with bibliography. As a Chair of Russian and Foreign Literature department of the Mordovian National Pedagogical Institute (later the Mordovia State University), for a quarter of a century, Bakhtin was promoting teaching approaches that would support students’ informed, independent, analytical and reflexive learning. According to the minutes from different department meetings at his university, over the years, Bakhtin struggled to define and improve his own guidance and teaching in the Literature studies and the overall work of his department. His three pedagogical goals for a literary lecture were: 1) Communication of certain information on a given topic - establishing the level of students’ familiarity with the topic; 2) Fostering students’ scientific thinking; and 3) Fostering students’ aesthetic perception and taste. Some of his former students emphasized his erudition, pedagogic skill, and ability to stimulate his students’ imagination and reflective thinking.
topic education, lieterature, instruction, purpose of education
url http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/234
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolailvasiliev mmbakhtinasauniversityprofessor
_version_ 1725268898165555200