Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems
A new concept has been developed to compare different ways of presenting instructions for action for evaluation procedures. The representation forms algorithm (A), image (I) and text (T) are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceiv...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2020-02-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020301365 |
| id |
doaj-c26867d6b55041c79e3ba57163a1723f |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-c26867d6b55041c79e3ba57163a1723f2020-11-25T02:56:35ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402020-02-0162e03291Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systemsClaudius Hammann0Christoph Krause1Anna Feldhütter2Technical University of Munich, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Nuclear Technology, Bolzmannstreet 15, 85748 Garching, Germany; Corresponding author.Technical University of Munich, Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Bolzmannstreet 15, 85748 Garching, GermanyTechnical University of Munich, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Ergonomics, Bolzmannstreet 15, 85748 Garching, GermanyA new concept has been developed to compare different ways of presenting instructions for action for evaluation procedures. The representation forms algorithm (A), image (I) and text (T) are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. Possible work errors 14 with 11 different steps in the representation. Results of positive work-task landing plane: algorithm 58 % (1.7/14 errors σ = 1.5), text 62 % (1.5/14 errors σ = 1.1), image 93 % (0.8/14 errors σ = 1.1).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020301365Safety engineeringAerospace engineeringSystem engineeringStandard operating proceduresWork errorIntroduction form |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Claudius Hammann Christoph Krause Anna Feldhütter |
| spellingShingle |
Claudius Hammann Christoph Krause Anna Feldhütter Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems Heliyon Safety engineering Aerospace engineering System engineering Standard operating procedures Work error Introduction form |
| author_facet |
Claudius Hammann Christoph Krause Anna Feldhütter |
| author_sort |
Claudius Hammann |
| title |
Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| title_short |
Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| title_full |
Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| title_sort |
evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems |
| publisher |
Elsevier |
| series |
Heliyon |
| issn |
2405-8440 |
| publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
| description |
A new concept has been developed to compare different ways of presenting instructions for action for evaluation procedures. The representation forms algorithm (A), image (I) and text (T) are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. Possible work errors 14 with 11 different steps in the representation. Results of positive work-task landing plane: algorithm 58 % (1.7/14 errors σ = 1.5), text 62 % (1.5/14 errors σ = 1.1), image 93 % (0.8/14 errors σ = 1.1). |
| topic |
Safety engineering Aerospace engineering System engineering Standard operating procedures Work error Introduction form |
| url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020301365 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT claudiushammann evaluationofalgorithmictextualandpictorialformsofrepresentationofstandardoperatingproceduresforerrorreductionincomplexsystems AT christophkrause evaluationofalgorithmictextualandpictorialformsofrepresentationofstandardoperatingproceduresforerrorreductionincomplexsystems AT annafeldhutter evaluationofalgorithmictextualandpictorialformsofrepresentationofstandardoperatingproceduresforerrorreductionincomplexsystems |
| _version_ |
1724713303595286528 |