Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results

Micrographic image analysis, tomography and the Archimedes method are commonly used to analyze the porosity of Selective Laser Melting (SLM)-produced parts and then to estimate the relative density. This article deals with the limitation of the relative density results to conclude on the quality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corinne Arvieu, Cassiopée Galy, Emilie Le Guen, Eric Lacoste
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/83
id doaj-c259e0bf25a64a69a8dc8acb626969e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c259e0bf25a64a69a8dc8acb626969e02020-11-25T03:54:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942020-08-014838310.3390/jmmp4030083Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of ResultsCorinne Arvieu0Cassiopée Galy1Emilie Le Guen2Eric Lacoste3Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, FranceArts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, FranceArts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, FranceArts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, FranceMicrographic image analysis, tomography and the Archimedes method are commonly used to analyze the porosity of Selective Laser Melting (SLM)-produced parts and then to estimate the relative density. This article deals with the limitation of the relative density results to conclude on the quality of a part manufactured by additive manufacturing and focuses on the interpretation of the relative density result. To achieve this aim, two experimental methods are used: the image analysis method, which provides local information on the distribution of porosity, and the Archimedes method, which provides access to global information. To investigate this, two different grades of aluminum alloy, AlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205, were used in this study. The study concludes that an analysis of the metallographic images to calculate the relative density of the part depends on the areas chosen for the analysis. In addition, the results show that the Archimedes method has limitations, particularly related to the choice of reference materials for calculating relative density. It can be observed, for example, that, depending on the experimental conditions, the calculation can lead to relative densities higher than 100%, which is inconsistent. This article shows that it is essential that a result of relative density obtained from Archimedes measurements be supplemented by an indication of the reference density used.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/83additive manufacturingselective laser meltingporosityrelative density measurementarchimedes methodAlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205 alloys
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Corinne Arvieu
Cassiopée Galy
Emilie Le Guen
Eric Lacoste
spellingShingle Corinne Arvieu
Cassiopée Galy
Emilie Le Guen
Eric Lacoste
Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
additive manufacturing
selective laser melting
porosity
relative density measurement
archimedes method
AlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205 alloys
author_facet Corinne Arvieu
Cassiopée Galy
Emilie Le Guen
Eric Lacoste
author_sort Corinne Arvieu
title Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
title_short Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
title_full Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
title_fullStr Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
title_full_unstemmed Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results
title_sort relative density of slm-produced aluminum alloy parts: interpretation of results
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
issn 2504-4494
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Micrographic image analysis, tomography and the Archimedes method are commonly used to analyze the porosity of Selective Laser Melting (SLM)-produced parts and then to estimate the relative density. This article deals with the limitation of the relative density results to conclude on the quality of a part manufactured by additive manufacturing and focuses on the interpretation of the relative density result. To achieve this aim, two experimental methods are used: the image analysis method, which provides local information on the distribution of porosity, and the Archimedes method, which provides access to global information. To investigate this, two different grades of aluminum alloy, AlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205, were used in this study. The study concludes that an analysis of the metallographic images to calculate the relative density of the part depends on the areas chosen for the analysis. In addition, the results show that the Archimedes method has limitations, particularly related to the choice of reference materials for calculating relative density. It can be observed, for example, that, depending on the experimental conditions, the calculation can lead to relative densities higher than 100%, which is inconsistent. This article shows that it is essential that a result of relative density obtained from Archimedes measurements be supplemented by an indication of the reference density used.
topic additive manufacturing
selective laser melting
porosity
relative density measurement
archimedes method
AlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205 alloys
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/4/3/83
work_keys_str_mv AT corinnearvieu relativedensityofslmproducedaluminumalloypartsinterpretationofresults
AT cassiopeegaly relativedensityofslmproducedaluminumalloypartsinterpretationofresults
AT emilieleguen relativedensityofslmproducedaluminumalloypartsinterpretationofresults
AT ericlacoste relativedensityofslmproducedaluminumalloypartsinterpretationofresults
_version_ 1724473998023065600