Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex

Drones are being introduced as innovative and cost-effective technologies for civil, commercial, and recreational purposes in the domestic realm. While the presence of these technologies is increasing, regulations are being introduced in order to ensure their safe and responsible use. As drones are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: C. Bracken-Roche
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-07-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/167/2016/gh-71-167-2016.pdf
id doaj-c254e530397b4477ab0104a43a221e5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c254e530397b4477ab0104a43a221e5e2020-11-24T22:31:08ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982016-07-0171316717210.5194/gh-71-167-2016Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complexC. Bracken-Roche0Department of Sociology, Queen's University, Kingston ON, M6P 2H2, CanadaDrones are being introduced as innovative and cost-effective technologies for civil, commercial, and recreational purposes in the domestic realm. While the presence of these technologies is increasing, regulations are being introduced in order to ensure their safe and responsible use. As drones are adopted for a number of purposes, the “de facto practices settle around it, rendering change much more difficult” (Gersher, 2014), and so the policy debates must consider all contingencies and unintended consequences of their use. This paper discusses the background of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), their role as surveillance technologies, and how they reinforce asymmetries in power and visibility that contribute to a politics of verticality, ultimately arguing that surveillance concerns must become part of the discussion at the policy and regulatory level in order to mitigate any harms. Where drones are already used for care and control as technologies of surveillance, privileged use of drones by public and police agencies could further reinforce a politics of verticality (Weizman, 2002), resulting in specific types of space, risk, and population management.http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/167/2016/gh-71-167-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Bracken-Roche
spellingShingle C. Bracken-Roche
Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet C. Bracken-Roche
author_sort C. Bracken-Roche
title Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
title_short Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
title_full Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
title_fullStr Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
title_full_unstemmed Domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
title_sort domestic drones: the politics of verticality and the surveillance industrial complex
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Drones are being introduced as innovative and cost-effective technologies for civil, commercial, and recreational purposes in the domestic realm. While the presence of these technologies is increasing, regulations are being introduced in order to ensure their safe and responsible use. As drones are adopted for a number of purposes, the “de facto practices settle around it, rendering change much more difficult” (Gersher, 2014), and so the policy debates must consider all contingencies and unintended consequences of their use. This paper discusses the background of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), their role as surveillance technologies, and how they reinforce asymmetries in power and visibility that contribute to a politics of verticality, ultimately arguing that surveillance concerns must become part of the discussion at the policy and regulatory level in order to mitigate any harms. Where drones are already used for care and control as technologies of surveillance, privileged use of drones by public and police agencies could further reinforce a politics of verticality (Weizman, 2002), resulting in specific types of space, risk, and population management.
url http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/167/2016/gh-71-167-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cbrackenroche domesticdronesthepoliticsofverticalityandthesurveillanceindustrialcomplex
_version_ 1725738574708473856