Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle

In a recent book, the historian Bas van Bommel has convincingly challenged the validity of the concept of “neo–humanism” (Neuhumanismus) as a description for nineteenth-century humanism in Germany. Bas van Bommel argues that, far from having put any “neo–humanist” project into practice, the contempo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christophe Bertiau
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg 2017-12-01
Series:Recherches Germaniques
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rg/278
id doaj-c24d355949c4429494ee2db398b40f28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c24d355949c4429494ee2db398b40f282021-07-08T16:59:11ZdeuPresses universitaires de StrasbourgRecherches Germaniques0399-19892649-860X2017-12-0147234010.4000/rg.278Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècleChristophe BertiauIn a recent book, the historian Bas van Bommel has convincingly challenged the validity of the concept of “neo–humanism” (Neuhumanismus) as a description for nineteenth-century humanism in Germany. Bas van Bommel argues that, far from having put any “neo–humanist” project into practice, the contemporaneous German educational system mainly preserved the tradition of the previous centuries. However, in undertaking this historical revision, I claim, the author has also understated some of the changes that were underway in the German educational system in the mentioned period. My research therefore disputes Bas van Bommel’s criticism, while at the same time deploying it to determine how great the importance of Latin really was in the German educational system in the first half of the 19th century. The instruction of Latin, I assert, was not neglected because of a “neo–humanist” predilection for ancient Greek ; rather, it continued to dominate the “secondary” education (höheres Schulwesen) and still maintained a respectable status at university, although having clearly lost some of its previous prerogatives. Only late in the 19th century did some changes dating back to the period around 1800 undermine the supremacy of Latin education in Germany.http://journals.openedition.org/rg/278
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christophe Bertiau
spellingShingle Christophe Bertiau
Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
Recherches Germaniques
author_facet Christophe Bertiau
author_sort Christophe Bertiau
title Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
title_short Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
title_full Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
title_fullStr Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
title_full_unstemmed Le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
title_sort le latin dans le système éducatif allemand de la première moitié du xixe siècle
publisher Presses universitaires de Strasbourg
series Recherches Germaniques
issn 0399-1989
2649-860X
publishDate 2017-12-01
description In a recent book, the historian Bas van Bommel has convincingly challenged the validity of the concept of “neo–humanism” (Neuhumanismus) as a description for nineteenth-century humanism in Germany. Bas van Bommel argues that, far from having put any “neo–humanist” project into practice, the contemporaneous German educational system mainly preserved the tradition of the previous centuries. However, in undertaking this historical revision, I claim, the author has also understated some of the changes that were underway in the German educational system in the mentioned period. My research therefore disputes Bas van Bommel’s criticism, while at the same time deploying it to determine how great the importance of Latin really was in the German educational system in the first half of the 19th century. The instruction of Latin, I assert, was not neglected because of a “neo–humanist” predilection for ancient Greek ; rather, it continued to dominate the “secondary” education (höheres Schulwesen) and still maintained a respectable status at university, although having clearly lost some of its previous prerogatives. Only late in the 19th century did some changes dating back to the period around 1800 undermine the supremacy of Latin education in Germany.
url http://journals.openedition.org/rg/278
work_keys_str_mv AT christophebertiau lelatindanslesystemeeducatifallemanddelapremieremoitieduxixesiecle
_version_ 1721312807935279104