The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.

PURPOSE:We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron's formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD:It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weili Zhang, Qinying Huang, Yile Chen, Jinying Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
id doaj-c24d3068ddf441f1bf49928d5eaef23d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c24d3068ddf441f1bf49928d5eaef23d2021-03-03T21:49:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023401610.1371/journal.pone.0234016The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.Weili ZhangQinying HuangYile ChenJinying LiPURPOSE:We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron's formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD:It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron's formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing-Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS:The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron's formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron's formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron's formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS:Heron's formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weili Zhang
Qinying Huang
Yile Chen
Jinying Li
spellingShingle Weili Zhang
Qinying Huang
Yile Chen
Jinying Li
The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Weili Zhang
Qinying Huang
Yile Chen
Jinying Li
author_sort Weili Zhang
title The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
title_short The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
title_full The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
title_fullStr The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron's formula.
title_sort feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple heron's formula.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description PURPOSE:We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron's formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD:It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron's formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing-Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS:The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron's formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron's formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron's formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS:Heron's formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
work_keys_str_mv AT weilizhang thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT qinyinghuang thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT yilechen thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT jinyingli thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT weilizhang feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT qinyinghuang feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT yilechen feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT jinyingli feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
_version_ 1714814837536587776