Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.

Despite the ongoing growth in the number of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and increased quality assessment of RCTs, the association between the quality and characteristics in the text has not been sufficiently studied. We are interested in a specific question: what kind of sentences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daisuke Yoneoka, Erika Ota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344454?pdf=render
id doaj-c22c8939b08c45dbb34fee291123e8ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c22c8939b08c45dbb34fee291123e8ee2020-11-24T20:45:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017352610.1371/journal.pone.0173526Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.Daisuke YoneokaErika OtaDespite the ongoing growth in the number of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and increased quality assessment of RCTs, the association between the quality and characteristics in the text has not been sufficiently studied. We are interested in a specific question: what kind of sentences is a good indicator of high quality RCTs? To help researchers to efficiently screen articles worth reading, this study aims 1) to quantify the linguistic features of articles and 2) to build a document assessment model to evaluate quality of RCTs using only the abstract. All RCTs that were conducted in Japan in 2010 as original articles were included in the analysis. Data were independently assessed by two reviewers using a risk-of-bias tool. Three aspects of linguistic style were quantitatively measured, and a document model was constructed to evaluate the RCTs. A total of 302 RCTs were selected for quality assessment. Of these, 255 articles were assessed as high quality and 47 as low quality. High-quality articles tended to use longer words than low-quality articles (p = 0.048), however sentences were generally shorter (p = 0.004). Further, high-quality articles included a larger proportion of noun phrases (p = 0.026) but a smaller proportion of verb phrases (p = 0.041). The optimal number of topics to assess the quality of articles was four, while two topics had a significant association with quality. Despite a number of articles published about RCTs in Japan, significant differences exist in several textual features between high- and low-quality RCTs. Instead of the risk-of-bias tool, these results can be used as the new criteria to rapidly screen valuable articles and it also revealed quality control of RCT articles is urgently needed in Japan.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344454?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daisuke Yoneoka
Erika Ota
spellingShingle Daisuke Yoneoka
Erika Ota
Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daisuke Yoneoka
Erika Ota
author_sort Daisuke Yoneoka
title Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
title_short Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
title_full Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: Case of Japanese randomized controlled trials.
title_sort evaluating association between linguistic characteristics of abstracts and risk of bias: case of japanese randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Despite the ongoing growth in the number of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and increased quality assessment of RCTs, the association between the quality and characteristics in the text has not been sufficiently studied. We are interested in a specific question: what kind of sentences is a good indicator of high quality RCTs? To help researchers to efficiently screen articles worth reading, this study aims 1) to quantify the linguistic features of articles and 2) to build a document assessment model to evaluate quality of RCTs using only the abstract. All RCTs that were conducted in Japan in 2010 as original articles were included in the analysis. Data were independently assessed by two reviewers using a risk-of-bias tool. Three aspects of linguistic style were quantitatively measured, and a document model was constructed to evaluate the RCTs. A total of 302 RCTs were selected for quality assessment. Of these, 255 articles were assessed as high quality and 47 as low quality. High-quality articles tended to use longer words than low-quality articles (p = 0.048), however sentences were generally shorter (p = 0.004). Further, high-quality articles included a larger proportion of noun phrases (p = 0.026) but a smaller proportion of verb phrases (p = 0.041). The optimal number of topics to assess the quality of articles was four, while two topics had a significant association with quality. Despite a number of articles published about RCTs in Japan, significant differences exist in several textual features between high- and low-quality RCTs. Instead of the risk-of-bias tool, these results can be used as the new criteria to rapidly screen valuable articles and it also revealed quality control of RCT articles is urgently needed in Japan.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5344454?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT daisukeyoneoka evaluatingassociationbetweenlinguisticcharacteristicsofabstractsandriskofbiascaseofjapaneserandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT erikaota evaluatingassociationbetweenlinguisticcharacteristicsofabstractsandriskofbiascaseofjapaneserandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1716814633050832896